|
THERE IS NO CULTURE OF POVERTY
For too long, educators' approach to understanding the relationships
between poverty, class and education has been framed by studying the
behaviors and cultures of poor students and their families. So says
Paul Gorski in "The Question of Class," a provocative article
published in Teaching Tolerance magazine. If only we -- in the
middle and upper-middle classes -- can understand their culture, why
those people don't value education, why those parents don't attend
our functions and meetings, why those kids are so unmotivated,
perhaps we can "save" some of our economically disadvantaged
students from bleak futures. And so we set about studying what Ruby
Payne and others describe as the "culture of poverty," how poor
people see and experience the world, how they relate to food, money,
relationships, education and other aspects of life. This, despite
the fact that research has shown again and again that no such
culture of poverty exists. It's all too easy, for even the most
well-meaning of us, to help perpetuate classism by buying into that
mindset, implementing activities and strategies for "working with
parents in poverty" or "teaching students in poverty" that, however
subtly, suggest we must fix poor people instead of eliminating the
inequities that oppress poor people. The question, of course, for
any educator of privilege committed to educational equity is this:
Do we choose to study supposed cultures or mindsets of poverty
because doing so doesn't require an examination of our own
class-based prejudices? By avoiding that question, we also avoid the
messy, painful work of analyzing how classism pervades our
classrooms and schools, never moving forward toward an authentic
understanding of poverty, class and education. We should never,
under any circumstance, make an assumption about a student or parent
-- about their values or culture or mindset -- based on a single
dimension of their identity. There is no more a single culture of
poverty than there is a single culture of woman-ness or of African
American-ness.
FORCED TO PICK A MAJOR IN HIGH SCHOOL
Ninth graders often have trouble selecting what clothes to wear to
school each morning or what to have for lunch. But starting this
fall, freshmen at Dwight Morrow High School in Bergen County, N.J.,
must declare a major that will determine what electives they take
for four years and be noted on their diplomas. For Dwight Morrow, a
school that has struggled with low test scores and racial tensions
for years, establishing majors is a way to make their students stay
interested until graduation and stand out in the hypercompetitive
college admissions process. Some parents have welcomed the
requirement, noting that a magnet school in the district already
allowed some students to specialize, reports Winnie Hu in the New
York Times. But other parents and some educators have criticized it
as pre-professionalism run amok or a marketing gimmick. Debra
Humphreys, a spokesperson for the Association of American Colleges
and Universities, called high school majors "a colossally bad idea,"
saying youngsters should instead concentrate on developing a broad
range of critical thinking and communication skills. "Today’s
economy requires people to be constantly learning and changing," Ms.
Humphreys said. "A lot of jobs that high school students are likely
to have 10 years from now don't yet exist, so preparing too narrowly
will not serve them well."
THE PROMISE OF EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES
& SUPPORTS FOR YOUTH
There is a growing realization that reaching our goal of ensuring
that all young people can graduate from any public high school with
competitive, marketable skills will require high quality educational
opportunities both during and beyond the school day. The inequities
in educational opportunities in schools have been well documented.
But the significant gaps within school-day learning opportunities
tell only part of the story. There are larger gaps outside the
proverbial schoolhouse in the kinds of supplemental services that
are essential for young people to develop the "capital" needed to
succeed. High-functioning extended learning activities should
promote socially and academically nurturing environments while
maintaining the interest and norms of students from diverse
cultures. Access to high quality enrichment activities can narrow
the opportunity and achievement gaps by helping students develop a
variety of necessary competencies to transition into adulthood and
awareness of the larger world around them. These competencies
include not only academic abilities; they also include social
competencies that enable young people to succeed in the workforce
and society, write Heidi Harris Lemmel and Robert Rothman in the new
issue of Voices in Urban Education. What would a high-functioning
system look like that provided equitable opportunities and that
integrated in-school and extended learning? The essays at the link
below show that creating meaningful opportunities involves a
deliberate effort to link schools with community organizations and
agencies. Such partnerships are new in many cities. Fortunately,
municipal leaders, educators, and community groups appear eager to
develop such partnerships and work together to build systems that
support student learning in and out of school. Such efforts are
essential if young people are to grow and develop to become engaged
citizens and productive adults. But the efforts also recognize, as
Mayor Cicilline puts it, that communities have a responsibility for
the healthy development of young people. It's time we all took that
responsibility seriously.
ENVIRONMENTAL
EDUCATION IN THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
Environmental issues like global warming and pollution are hot
topics in the media, the halls of Congress, and at water coolers
everywhere. But, in schools, students are hearing less and less
about these issues. Why? The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB),
enacted in 2002, forces schools to curtail or abandon environmental
education. At the same time, the amount of federal funding for
environmental education has dwindled. Interest in environmental
education has steadily increased for three decades, but investment
in these programs came to a screeching halt when NCLB was enacted in
2002. In 2007, voters, educators, and parents have a golden
opportunity to bring environmental education back to the forefront
of classrooms nationwide. NCLB expires this year and must be
re-authorized by Congress. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, North
American Association for Environmental Education, Center for
Environmental Literacy, and others are working to change NCLB and
increase funding for environmental education in America's schools.
NCLB was enacted to give teachers greater authority and flexibility
in exchange for more accountability. However, the law places
overwhelming emphasis on reading and math and requires stringent
testing on these two subjects. This forces many schools to abandon
environmental education programs so they can invest more time and
money in math and language arts. To learn more, visit the above
link.
HISTORIAN ADVISES LAWMAKERS ON SCHOOL
Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David McCullough told the nation’s
state legislators that schools need to do a better job of educating
American students about significant past events and personalities.
The bestselling author warned that students in this country are
growing up historically illiterate. A key to solving that problem is
to make sure teachers are better prepared for the classroom, reports
Eric Kelderman for Stateline.org. "We've got to get over this idea
that teachers are sort of glorified babysitters who take care of our
children or our grandchildren while we're doing the important work.
They are doing the important work. And we've got to do a much better
job of teaching our teachers," McCullough said. He praised colleges
that require future teachers to have a subject major outside of
education. "For a young person to go into teaching and graduate with
a degree in education and no major of the usual kind is to send that
person into the classroom with an enormous handicap, which will be
passed on to students," he said. On top of that, higher education in
general should set more specific course standards, he urged. "Of the
50 supposedly best colleges and universities in the country, at very
few of them is history required for graduation. In many cases, no
foreign language is required nor is any science required and yet we
say to these people on commencement day that they are educated. Who
are we kidding?" McCullough also said many textbooks are so "dreary
and boring" that they seemed to have been written with the intention
of killing interest in history. The popular Harry Potter series of
books proves that younger children are capable of digesting complex
information on any topic if it is presented as an interesting story,
he said. "If I were in your role, if I had a chance to direct where
money would be applied to improve the situation of the teaching of
history in our schools, I would concentrate on grade school --
third, fourth, fifth, sixth grade -- because that’s the time that
they want to know," he said. "At that age … it’s not yet cool to be
dumb and they're not afraid to ask what might be taken as a dumb
question," McCullough said.
AN OUTRAGEOUS CAT TEACHES A NEW GENERATION TO
READ
Greece had Zeus. America has Seuss. In the 50 years since "The Cat
in the Hat" exploded onto the children's book scene, Theodor Seuss
Geisel -- pen name "Dr. Seuss" -- has become a central character in
the American literary mythology, sharing the pantheon with the likes
of Mark Twain and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Of his many imaginative
stories, "The Cat in the Hat" remains the most iconic. The tale,
writes Chris Wilson in U.S. News & World Report, is about the
irreverent cat who waltzes uninvited into a house where two children
have been left alone for the day and proceeds to violate every tenet
of their mother's commandments. It came at a time when children's
literature was largely dominated by Aesop's fables and other stories
with explicit morals -- lessons that the cat flouts with zeal. "It
was extremely radical when it came out," says Eliza Dresang of
Florida State University, who studies children's literature. The
particular endurance of Cat, many critics say, is owed partly to its
origins in an emerging philosophy of phonetic learning. Most of the
236 individual words in the book were taken from a list of beginner
words for new readers, and only a few are more than one syllable.
The "anapestic" meter -- two unstressed syllables followed by a
stressed syllable -- marks out a cadence that is easy for young
readers to grasp. Using this model, Geisel and partners would go on
to found a whole series called Beginner Books. "When you're reading
aloud, you can just feel what's supposed to come next," says Joyce
Herbeck, an education professor at Montana State University. "It
makes them feel like readers right away."
TITLE I FUNDS: WHO’S GAINING? WHO’S LOSING?
With Title I funding streams remaining essentially flat over the
last two years, a majority of states appear unable to reserve the
full amount of funds required for school improvement efforts under
the No Child Left Behind Act, according to a report from the
independent, Washington, D.C.-based Center on Education Policy. The
report, which analyzes 2007-08 Title I, Part A allocations from the
U.S. Department of Education, also finds that the level of Title I
funding received by some states and school districts is extremely
volatile, due to updated calculations made each year under the law’s
funding formulas. The report highlights the impact of annual poverty
count updates on the distribution of funds and discusses the
mandatory state reservation of funds for school improvement
activities.
SCHOOLS ADVISED TO NARROW FOCUS TO CRUCIAL
LESSONS
Oregon should stop asking schools to teach a laundry list of facts
and skills in every subject and instead encourage teachers to focus
on crucial lessons with lasting value, a new study recommends.
WestEd, a nonprofit research center that specializes in state
academic standards and tests, spent nine months examining Oregon's
academic standards for every subject and grade plus every question
on state tests. The state paid WestEd $350,000 to find weaknesses in
its tests and standards and recommend fixes. In its final report,
the think tank concluded Oregon should join a new national movement
toward "less is more" in curriculum mandates. The state should
direct schools, teachers and students toward the most important
content for students to master, rather than requiring schools to
cover the waterfront, the study recommends. Oregon's current
approach to teaching and testing, for instance, calls on
fourth-grade teachers to instill 105 new reading and writing skills,
including 47 covered on state tests. Those range from "determine the
meaning of words from context and structural clues" to "correctly
write possessive plural nouns." Nothing signals teachers which of
the myriad skills it is most essential for students to learn well,
reports Betsy Hammond for The Oregonian. That approach is why U.S.
schools have been criticized for a curriculum that is a mile wide
but an inch deep, particularly compared to other nations' approach
to teaching math and science, said Stanley Rabinowitz, lead author
of the WestEd study. It is easy for state curriculum committees to
make a long list of what teachers should cover each year, Rabinowitz
said. It takes a lot more thought and debate to decide what content
is most important -- and Oregon should think carefully about which
people get to help make that call, he said. Oregonians, including
teachers, employers, parents, college officials and principals,
should be at the table, he said.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: THE MISSING PIECE OF A
WELL-ROUNDED EDUCATION
Michael Pritchard is a healer, and a pioneer in the field of
social-emotional learning (SEL), the often-neglected missing piece
in a well-rounded education. For the past two decades, he has been
touring the country, talking and listening to students, teachers,
and parents. He has written two books and produced a series of
award-winning videos that focus on the critical issues of character
and emotional intelligence for middle and high school students.
"What I try to teach kids is that we have to be more real about our
emotions," explains Pritchard. "Shakespeare said, 'Always give
sorrow words. Grief that does not speak whispers to the over-fraught
heart and bids it to break.' I'm teaching kids that tears that do
not flow will make other organs weep inside us. We get sick if we
try to hold all that pain in. And then, the unaddressed grief turns
to anger, and the anger to rage. And it has two directions -- out to
the community, or inward toward the self, and self-destructiveness."
For years, most mainstream educators have marginalized Pritchard and
other SEL advocates. Now, their pleas for others who work with
youths to "get real" about students' emotions are finally being
heard. Late last year, the Illinois State Board of Education
distributed the state's new Social and Emotional Learning Standards
for K-12 students. Just as standards in language arts and math, for
example, require students to achieve certain benchmarks, the SEL
guidelines hold them accountable for proficiency in self-awareness,
social awareness, and decision making. For Maurice Elias, author of
"Raising Emotionally Intelligent Teenagers and Emotionally
Intelligent Parenting", this is one school reform effort that just
might work. "When you look at the literature on education reform,
it's replete with failure," says Elias. "We've been treating
students as if they're not people -- as if they're somehow sponges,
and not human beings that come in with their emotions in full
play."I don't know of anybody that can learn in the absence of a
positive relationship," he adds. "We learn from the people we care
about. And yet we somehow pretend that in school, it doesn't matter.
So, those who are actually concerned about academics should be
concerned about social and emotional learning as well." Numerous
studies link emotional well-being to academic success, and stress to
failure, writes Ken Ellis in Edutopia. For Pritchard, teaching SEL
is a no-brainer. "I say to the principals, 'No matter what we teach
kids, love is more important than any knowledge we give them.'
Because they can't become the gift that they're supposed to become
if they're disconnected from their heart."
FOR-PROFIT EDUCATION COMPANIES TAKE PUBLIC
MONEY, PROVIDE LITTLE INFORMATION
"Profiles of For-Profit Education Management Organizations:
2006-2007" released by the Arizona State University Commercialism in
Education and Education Policy Research Units finds that, despite
repeated requests, several large publicly funded Education
Management Organizations (EMOs) failed to provide information about
their schools or finances when queried by researchers. The data
collected in the report suggest that the number of charter schools
overall has increased and the number of EMO-run charter schools has
stabilized or declined slightly. The number of students enrolled in
charter schools has shown a slight decrease. Large-size Education
Management Organizations appear to have increased the percentage of
charter school students educated in their schools. EMO enrollments
are heavily concentrated in the primary grades and EMO-run charter
primary schools are likely to be larger than the national average
enrollment for charter primary schools. The report finds that:
|
1.
|
A significant number of students attending charter
schools (about 25 percent) are enrolled in schools run by EMOs; |
|
2.
|
Large-size EMOs dominate the for-profit education
management industry; |
|
3.
|
EMOs focus on charter primary schools; and |
|
4.
|
A significant percentage (about 89 percent) of students
enrolled in EMO-run charter primary schools will be in a school larger
than the national average. |
Professor Alex Molnar, a co-author of the report, suggests that
policy makers take a close look at the business models as well
as the education models of EMOs: "For-profit firms are cashing
checks worth a lot of taxpayer dollars. They do so while
withholding as much information as possible from the public.
This does not seem like a situation likely to benefit taxpayers
and school children either financially or educationally."
HOW NCLB ALLOWS STATE TO SET THE BAR TOO LOW FOR IMPROVING HIGH
SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES
Despite the national focus on reforming America’s high schools, most
states are setting woefully low goals for improving graduation rates
and are not setting goals for ensuring that more low-income,
minority, disabled and English language learner students graduate,
according to a new report released by The Education Trust.
"Graduation Matters: Improving Accountability for High School
Graduation" documents state-set goals for graduation rates under the
federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law, showing how improvement
targets are often so low that they undercut the aim of significantly
raising graduation rates. "One in four students who start ninth
grade will not earn a diploma four years later, and the picture is
even worse for low-income students and students of color," said
Daria Hall, Assistant Director for K-12 Policy at The Education
Trust, and the report’s author. "Because current graduation rates
are so low, we need targets that provoke action on behalf of
students, not ones that condone the status quo." Under the NCLB
accountability provisions known as Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP),
U.S. high schools must meet state goals for educating all students
in reading and math as well as graduating them on time. While the
AYP provisions are explicit about procedures for setting proficiency
targets in math and reading, the discretion the law gives states in
setting graduation-rate goals and improvement targets has resulted
in a wide range of expectations, as demonstrated in the report.
TEENS & ‘TWEENS ARE CREATING CONTENT &
CONNECTING ONLINE FOR EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS
A new study by the National School Boards Association and Grunwald
Associates LLC exploring the online behaviors of U.S. teens and
‘tweens shows that 96 percent of students with online access use
social networking technologies, such as chatting, text messaging,
blogging, and visiting online communities such as Facebook, MySpace,
and Webkinz. Further, students report that one of the most common
topics of conversation on the social networking scene is education.
Nearly 60 percent of online students report discussing
education-related topics such as college or college planning,
learning outside of school, and careers. And 50 percent of online
students say they talk specifically about schoolwork. "There is no
doubt that these online teen hangouts are having a huge influence on
how kids today are creatively thinking and behaving," said Anne L.
Bryant, executive director of the National School Boards
Association. "The challenge for school boards and educators is that
they have to keep pace with how students are using these tools in
positive ways and consider how they might incorporate this
technology into the school setting." Today, students report that
they are spending almost as much time using social networking
services and websites as they spend watching television. Among teens
who use social networking sites, that amounts to about 9 hours a
week online, compared to 10 hours a week watching television.
EDUCATORS WANTED TO PILOT NEW TEACH UNICEF
CURRICULUM
In an attempt to bring a greater global perspective to US
classrooms, the U.S. Fund for UNICEF is looking to partner with U.S.
teachers this fall, to pilot its new "TeachUNICEF" educational
materials for grades 6-8 and 9-12. These unique lesson plans are
based on UNICEF's 2006 "State of the World's Children Report". They
examine how issues of poverty, armed conflict, child labor and
disability impact the lives of children in developing countries, and
what UNICEF is doing to overcome these challenges to children's
survival and development. Teachers will be asked to choose two
lesson plans to present to their class, which are downloadable off
of the TeachUNICEF website. Following the pilot program, teachers
will be requested to complete a short online survey form in order to
provide feedback on the materials. The U.S. Fund for UNICEF is pilot
testing this TeachUNICEF series. If you are a middle school or high
school teacher interested in providing feedback for the pilot,
please contact us at
TeachUNICEF@unicefusa.org. |