|
PUBLIC SCHOOLS MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE,
AMERICANS SAY
Americans believe public schools must be held accountable for
properly educating children and give the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
high marks for its goals, but also think NCLB needs dramatic
changes, according to results from three years of nationwide
hearings held by Public Education Network (PEN). The results were
released by PEN this week in a new report "Open to the Public: How
Communities, Parents and Students Assess the Impact of the No Child
Left Behind Act, 2004-2007. The Realities Left Behind." NCLB, slated
for re-authorization by Congress this year, has been praised,
vilified, noted as a well-meaning step in the right direction, and
hotly criticized for not doing nearly enough to fix the nation’s
public school woes by various sectors of the professional education
community. Little has been said about what average, everyday
Americans think about NCLB. Overall, Americans do think public
schools must be held accountable for properly educating children.
Based on the hearing and survey results, PEN recommends that NCLB’s
re-authorization include:
|
1.
|
retaining the emphasis on highly qualified teachers but
providing resources to help teachers become more effective; |
|
2.
|
implementing student-focused, comprehensive
accountability systems; |
|
3.
|
expanding opportunities for shared accountability for
including the community as partners; |
|
4.
|
strengthening parental involvement provisions; |
|
5.
|
increasing capacity at state and local levels to provide
school and student supports to implement NCLB, especially for
low-performing schools; and, |
|
6.
|
fully funding any re-authorized act. "Over three years,
and at every hearing site, the public supported the goals of NCLB.
|
However, until the act addresses the realities of inequities,
limited expectations of student and teacher capacities, and the
isolation of parents and communities from school reforms, it
will engender more rhetoric than real difference in the success
of all students," said Wendy D. Puriefoy, president and CEO of
Public Education Network. "The public voice must be part of the
process used by policymakers if they want to be trusted on
behalf of the nation’s children."
HOW SCHOOLS GET IT RIGHT
Whether they are in wealthy or poor neighborhoods, schools with lots
of high-scoring students share certain characteristics. They have
experienced teachers who stay for years, reports Liz Bowie in the
Baltimore Sun, and they offer extracurricular activities after
school. Sometimes, they have many students in gifted-and-talented
classes working with advanced material. These are the schools that
families looking for a great public education will seek out and move
close to because students are achieving far beyond the basic levels
set by state and federal laws. It isn't just experience and tenure
that seem to matter in successful schools. Teachers also need to
feel they have some say in how their school is run, educators say.
When staff members go to the principal with a new idea, they usually
will be allowed to try it out. Top-performing schools also have a
lot of extracurricular activities. In some cases, the chess club,
writing club and geography clubs are run by parents. Principals say
the discussion in these high-performing schools has moved away from
worrying about how many students will pass to how many students will
fly through the test with ease and score in the advanced category.
CORE
PRINCIPLES FOR ENGAGING YOUNG PEOPLE IN COMMUNITY CHANGE
Young people are disproportionately involved in and affected by the
problems that beset communities and states. Recent research studies
suggest that young people are not doing well because communities are
not doing well by young people. Young people are not only at the
center of many problems, they are the source of many solutions. And
studies show that young people want to be engaged as change makers.
However, the true engagement of young people in change processes
requires a fundamental shift in how decisions are made. Engaging
young people as partners in community change is a compelling idea,
but translating that idea into effective practice requires focused
attention to a range issues. The principles described in this paper
by Karen Pittman, Shanetta Martin and Anderson Williams emerged from
the commingling of research and practice that occurred when the
Forum for Youth Investment merged with Community IMPACT! USA. They
are important but simple principles for putting the idea of youth
engagement into practice. They can be implemented in a wide range of
organizations, including schools, youth organizations or community
centers that want to strengthen their commitment to youth
leadership, or community-change focused organizations or coalitions
that want to strengthen their commitment to youth involvement.
THE QUICK & EASY GUIDE TO SCHOOL WELLNESS
Healthy Schools Campaign and School Health Corp. are pleased to
announce the release of "The Quick & Easy Guide to School Wellness",
a multimedia how-to guide filled with comprehensive information,
practical advice, tools and resources. The guide made its debut at
the National Association of School Nurses conference in Nashville,
Tenn. with positive and enthusiastic reviews from school nurse
leaders in attendance. Nearly 500 school nurses requested the guide
in the first two days of its release, and hundreds of additional
school stakeholders have ordered the guide since its release. The
guide, available free of charge to schools and nonprofits, was
developed in response to a need for school stakeholders -- nurses,
teachers, parents, administrators and students -- to effectively
implement the school wellness policies that became mandatory in fall
2006. The guide includes multiple case studies, bonus tip sheets,
and a comprehensive set of documents and resources from leading
organizations throughout the country. "We want people to understand
that they have the power to make their school wellness policy work,
to really change things for the better," said Jean Saunders,
director of school wellness for the Healthy Schools Campaign. "It
doesn't have to be overwhelming. This guide brings together the most
important resources in one place and makes it easy to create healthy
change one step at a time."
THREE WOMEN, THREE SCHOOLS, TWENTY YEARS OF
INFLUENCE
Karin Chenoweth, Stephanie Jones and Alies Muskin have been heavily
involved in their children’s education and the community since their
oldest daughters entered kindergarten more than 20 years ago. Each
has a career background in social work or education, but the
dedication to the school system came from a desire to make sure the
community was a good place for the children and their neighbors.
‘‘We got involved because it was important for our kids, important
for us and important for our communities," Chenoweth said.
‘‘Whatever power we have was because we did not go in thinking we
were going to make a difference for our kids only." Even while their
children were learning the ABCs and basic math skills, the mothers
were asking about what programs would be available at the high
school level, reports Kristina Gawrgy in The Gazette (Maryland).
Although a lot of the women’s work centered on bettering the school
system, they also made an effort to show parents how they could get
involved. Most importantly, the women provided a network of people
willing to fight for the children and the community.
NO SCHOOL, NO DRIVING, SAYS ILLINOIS
Driving a car ranks near the top of many teenagers' wish lists;
school, for some, doesn't make the list at all. So this fall the
secretary of state's office and state education officials will try
to use that desire to get behind the wheel as leverage to keep more
of them in the classroom. A state law that went into effect July 1
will revoke the licenses of students who have more than 18 unexcused
absences from school, are expelled or drop out, reports Carlos
Sadovi in the Chicago Tribune. It's part of an effort to stem the
statewide dropout rate, which topped 24,000 students last year. The
number has declined from more than 36,000 five years ago, but
education leaders and lawmakers think the new law can help bring it
down further. Under the law, teenagers under age 18 are required to
attend school to get their licenses or learner's permits. If they
don't, their licenses could be revoked until they are 18. Illinois
students have to attend school until they are 17.
KIDS COUNT DATA BOOK
The Annie E. Casey Foundation has released the 18th annual KIDS
COUNT Data Book, a national and state-by-state effort to track the
status of children in the U.S. By providing policymakers and
citizens with benchmarks of child well-being, KIDS COUNT seeks to
enrich local, state, and national discussions concerning ways to
secure better futures for all children. This year's essay examines
the child welfare system and challenges the country to focus on the
726,000 children who spend time in foster care each year and to
build and strengthen family relationships. Taking up the challenge
of protecting these most-at-risk children requires a re-examination
of the purpose and goals of the nation’s child welfare systems. The
goal of getting vulnerable children "out of harm’s way" remains
central to the public’s understanding of what the child welfare
system does. This task is enormously difficult, as we are all too
often reminded by the highly publicized tragedies of children known
to local protective services -- or even removed from their families
and placed in foster care -- who nevertheless come to grave harm.
Child welfare practitioners and researchers continue their struggle
to improve the likelihood that we can accurately identify dangerous
situations and intervene to protect children when, if not before,
they are in serious danger. But the harsh truth is that simply
removing children from dangerous homes does not, by itself, ensure
that they will receive the protection, nurturing, structure, and
stability that they need to grow up healthy and successful. Too
often, the opposite is true. For many children, family separation is
hurtful and traumatic -- even when the family has consistently not
met their needs. And for far too many, their experience in the child
welfare system only compounds this trauma. Child welfare systems too
often make placement decisions that unnecessarily add to the
confusion, insecurity, and isolation felt by kids removed from their
families.
STATUS OF EDUCATION IN RURAL AMERICA
The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) has just
released the report "Status of Education in Rural America." This
report presents a series of indicators on the status of education in
rural America based on their actual geographic coordinates into one
of 12 locale categories and distinguishes between rural areas that
are on the fringe of an urban area, rural areas that are at some
distance, and rural areas that are remote. The findings of this
report indicate that in 2003-04, over half of all operating school
districts and one-third of all public schools in the United States
were in rural areas. However, only one-fifth of all public school
students were enrolled in rural areas. A larger percentage of public
school students in rural areas attended very small schools than
those in any other locale. A larger percentage of rural public
school students in the 4th- and 8th-grades scored at or above the
Proficient level on the National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP) reading, mathematics, and science assessments in 2005 than
did public school students in cities at these grade levels. However,
smaller percentages of rural public school students than suburban
public school students scored at or above the Proficient level in
reading and mathematics. In 2004, the high school status dropout
rate (i.e., the percentage of persons not enrolled in school and not
having completed high school) among 16- to 24-year-olds in rural
areas was higher than in suburban areas, but lower than in cities.
Current public school expenditures per student were higher in rural
areas in 2003-04 than in any other locale after adjusting for
geographic cost differences. Racial/ethnic minorities account for a
smaller percentage of public school teachers in rural schools than
in schools in all other locales in 2003-04. In general, smaller
percentages of public school teachers in rural areas than across the
nation as a whole reported problems as "serious" and behavioral
problems as frequent in their schools in 2003-04. Likewise, a larger
percentage of public school teachers in rural areas than in other
locales reported being satisfied with the teaching conditions in
their school in 2003-04, though a smaller percentage of rural public
school teachers than suburban public school teachers reported being
satisfied with their salary. Public school teachers in rural areas
earned less, on average, in 2003-04 than their peers in other
locales, even after adjusting for geographic cost differences.
REFUSING TO LEAVE DESEGREGATION BEHIND
In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on two racial
integration cases from Louisville, Ky. and Seattle, Amy Stuart
Wells, Jacquelyn Duran and Terrenda White explore the mismatch
between the rationale of the Court's majority in declaring these
desegregation plans unconstitutional and the social science research
on the long-term effects of such plans on the adults who had
desegregated school experiences as children. They conclude that two
powerful and intertwined themes found in both new and existing
research -- that racial discrimination and its legacies still exist
in the form of "structural inequality" and the "diversity rationale"
for bringing children of different backgrounds together to learn --
both support the efforts of the two school districts in these cases.
LATINO VOTERS MOST IMPACTED BY CANDIDATE
EDUCATION POSITIONS
A new poll shows that a candidate’s position on education will have
a greater impact on Latino voters than their position on any other
issue -- including immigration and health care -- and that Latinos
are nearly unanimous (89 percent) in saying that improving public
education should be a "very important priority" for the next
president. The poll surveyed 1,026 registered Latino voters. "The
Latino community is increasingly showing its desire to help shape
the future of our country at the ballot box," said Janet Murguia,
president and CEO of the National Council of La Raza, the largest
Latino civil rights and advocacy organization in the U.S. and
steering committee member for ED in ’08, a nonpartisan campaign to
raise awareness of education issues in the 2008 presidential race
campaign. Other key findings include:
|
1.
|
Latino voters consider the high dropout rate among Latino
students to be the greatest educational problem for the Latino community
in the U.S.; |
|
2.
|
Half of those surveyed declared that they considered the
quality of public schools to be "mediocre" or "poor"; and, |
|
3.
|
While generally rating teachers positively, more than 80
percent of the Latino electorate feels that one way to improve public
education in America is to hire more teachers with expertise in the
subjects they will teach. |
The poll was co-sponsored by ED in ’08 and the National Council
of La Raza.
TESTED: ONE AMERICAN SCHOOL STRUGGLES TO
MAKE THE GRADE
A new book by Linda Perlstein chronicles a year with the
teachers, principal, counselors, and students from a
high-poverty Maryland elementary school, from the release of a
set of amazing test scores until the time a year later when the
school finds out if the achievement has been repeated. The book
explains, through a set of dynamic characters, the benefits and
costs of the apparent success, what works and what doesn't in
school reform, and what it looks like when educators must not
just teach children but in many ways raise them. Parents will
appreciate learning what goes on behind classroom doors and how
public policy has changed what children learn -- not always for
the better. Policymakers should learn about the consequences of
their decisions and the high costs, not just financial but
human, of implementing them. Teachers and administrators might
find comfort that someone has chronicled the challenges they
face in a system that keeps getting more complicated. This book
will school reform advocates fodder to help explain their many
concerns to the general public, especially as the No Child Left
Behind Act comes up for renewal. An excerpt can be found at the
above link.
TOO MUCH DUE PROCESS FOR A FELON PRINCIPAL
Sometimes, the law’s an ass, write the editors of the Tacoma
(Wash.) News Tribune. As when it becomes nigh-unto-impossible to
quickly fire a principal after he’s convicted of a serious
felony -- because state law requires that he first be offered
elaborate due process. That’s the predicament the Tacoma School
District finds itself in with Harold Wright Jr. He was principal
of Baker Middle School before July 12, when he was found guilty
of third-degree rape, a felony. He remains principal today,
because he has refused to give up his position as expected. In
the meantime, Wright, 36, continues to collect his
$8,245-a-month salary, something he’s been doing since February,
when he was first charged. So far, the district appears to have
paid him at least $45,000 for time he wasn't working. There are
not many other jobs where commission of a felony can earn the
perpetrator a sweet paid vacation. But in all Washington’s
public schools even convictions for grave crimes do not permit
administrators to simply fire the convicts. State law explicitly
gives all educators the right to a potentially lengthy process
of responses, hearings and appeals. This is not a quarrel with
due process in general. The law protects educators and other
public employees from arbitrary, groundless firings by
vindictive or incompetent administrators. School districts
should not be able to dump employees without good reason and
without the employees being allowed to defend themselves. But a
rape conviction -- by a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt -- is
plenty good reason.
THE CASE FOR TEACHING THE BIBLE
Public school courses on the Bible are growing nationwide. There
aren't that many. But they're rising in popularity. Last year
Georgia became the first state in memory to offer funds for high
school electives on the Old and New Testaments using the Bible
as the core text. Similar funding was discussed in several other
legislatures, although the initiatives did not become law.
Meanwhile, two privately produced curriculums crafted
specifically to pass church-state muster are competing for use
in individual schools nationwide. Combined, they are employed in
460 districts in at least 37 states. The numbers are modest, but
their publishers expect them to soar. The smaller of the two
went into operation just last year but is already into its
second 10,000-copy printing, has expressions of interest from
1,000 new districts this year and expects many more. The larger
publisher claims to be roughly doubling the number of districts
it adds each year. These new curriculums plus polls suggesting
that over 60 percent of Americans favor secular teaching about
the Bible suggest that a public school teacher may soon be
talking about Matthew or Genesis in a school near you. To some,
this idea seems retrograde. Citing a series of Supreme Court
decisions culminating in 1963's Abington Township School
District v. Schempp, which removed prayer and devotion from the
classroom, the skeptics ask whether it is safe to bring back the
source of all that sectarianism. But a new, post-Schempp
coalition insists it is essential to do so. It argues that
teaching the Bible in schools -- as an object of study, not
God's received word -- is eminently constitutional. The Bible so
pervades Western culture, it says, that it's hard to call anyone
educated who hasn't at least given thought to its key passages.
The "new consensus" for secular Bible study argues that
knowledge of it is essential to being a full-fledged,
well-rounded citizen. In TIME Magazine, David Van Biema examines
that argument and asks "Is it constitutional?"
NIPPING BIAS IN THE BUD
Some preschools are using a special program to teach their
students, before prejudices take hold, to respect cultural,
racial and religious diversity, reports Carla Rivera in the Los
Angeles Times. Sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League's Miller
Early Childhood Initiative, "A World of Difference Institute",
is one of the few anti-bias programs specifically for
preschoolers, drawing on research showing that children begin to
perceive differences and attach negative or positive values to
them as early as age 3. Now operating in 14 cities, the program
trains teachers in strategies to confront prejudice and uses
specially designed materials developed with the characters from
"Sesame Street." The goal is to teach tolerance, respect and
inclusion in a way that is geared to young minds. "We really
wanted to focus on building the right foundations," said Lindsay
Friedman of A World of Difference Institute. "We know that
biases and stereotyping are seeping in even at this age, but
this is meant to be a preventive approach, not as much
countering negative messages as building positive ones." One of
the strongest aspects of the program is the outreach to parents,
who also are encouraged to attend workshops and use the
curriculum at home. Studies have shown that children learn
social cues at an early age from their environment, the media,
and especially from the behavior and words of caregivers and
family members. About 85 percent of the brain develops during
ages three to five, and impressions formed after age two are
lasting, said Linda A. Santora of the Anti-Defamation League.
One study found that 50 percent of children formed racial biases
by age six, she said. |