|
WHAT’S NEXT FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION?
As the National Education Association (NEA) celebrates its 150th
anniversary, they asked educators and experts what they see in the
years ahead. It may seem that our schools still all too often "model
1950s architecture, use 1990s technology, and deliver 1960s
curriculum." So admits educator and architect Jeffery A. Lackney,
but behind the bricks and mortar that make up our public schools, a
groundswell is rising. Technology promises to transform our
classrooms. A global economy and a changing society force us to
revisit long-held assumptions of who our students are -- and who
they might become. In this online feature, NEA asked leaders from
many walks of life what they think the future holds for public
education -- a future they believe is bright. As author and educator
Jonathan Kozol writes, "…I believe that a rebirth of public
education -- of the joy that teachers take in it and the benefits it
brings to children -- is ahead of us. I'm meeting tens of thousands
of the best and brightest students in our universities and colleges
who are determined to come in and work with us in public schools,
not voucher schools, not boutique schools, not semi-private charter
schools run by the business sector. They represent a burst of
idealistic energy, a love for children, and a thirst for justice,
which will reinforce the passions of those in the classroom now. The
tide of discontent with punitive, test-driven, and fear-driven
methods of instruction is rising to the point at which I am
convinced that we will see, within the next five years, a militant
revival of enlightened opposition to these practices among our
rank-and-file teachers. These teachers know they are in a battle for
the soul of public education. Many feel intimidated by the sword of
threats and sanctions under which they are obliged to teach today.
But, sooner or later, these teachers will rise up and make their
voices heard."
PUBLIC RHETORIC, PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY & THE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
There are vital relationships between public rhetoric and public
policy in a democratic society, and education historian, Ellen
Condliffe Lagemann, commenting in Education Week, outlines several
reasons why current rhetoric emphasizes school failure without
giving equal emphasis to the social failures that often surround the
public schools. She thinks the true story is not that our schools
have failed us. It is rather that we, as a society, have failed our
schools. We have failed our schools because we have asked them to do
impossible things. What might happen if we paid less attention to
outcomes, as measured by test scores, and more attention to how
children learn, which is one of the most important processes of
education? This could force us to attend more sensibly to schooling
within the social and cultural contexts in which it occurs. Studying
the processes of education could make us think more about
relationships between education in families and neighborhoods, on
the one hand, and in schools, on the other. Studying the ways in
which children learn could help us focus on cultural differences
between and among the children who sit in the same classroom, and on
how those cultural differences might be used to empower learning
rather than to stand in its way. The imbalance between what we
expect of public schools and offer them by way of support is not
different from what we have asked the U.S. military to do in Iraq.
We seem more inclined these days to delegate responsibility to
others than to assume it ourselves. Outside contractors are playing
increasing roles in both our military and educational pursuits, and
in a truly democratic society neither function should be contracted
out.
SENIORITIS: RAMPANT, REAL, NO KNOWN CURE
Educators and policy makers are searching for a cure for a common
malady that's highly contagious this time of year. Senior-itis --
the tendency of seniors to slack off during their final year of high
school -- is a uniquely American rite of passage, reports Scott
Stephens for the Plain Dealer (Cleveland). By the time spring rolls
around, many seniors have been accepted to college, have a job lined
up, plan to travel overseas or are simply bored with school.
Research confirms that senior-itis, if not epidemic, is at least a
real concern. Recent data from the U.S. Department of Education's
High School Transcript Study found that high school seniors in 2005
earned slightly better grades, but fewer credits, than they did in
grades 9 to 11. The credit difference equated to 48 fewer hours of
classroom instruction. Researchers theorize that many students
complete difficult math and science credits before their senior
year, leaving themselves with easier electives to fill their
schedule. Many believe that the trend of early college acceptance --
a practice that lets students pick a college early in their final
year of high school -- has made the senior slump worse.
WHAT IS BEING SAID ABOUT NCLB
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), signed into law in 2002, is
scheduled for congressional re-authorization this year. Exactly when
Congress and the president will sign on the dotted line is
uncertain, reports Susan Black in American School Board Journal, and
some officials speculate a vote on NCLB will be postponed until
after the 2008 elections. But that uncertainty hasn't slowed a storm
of reports, hearings, and intense lobbying seeking to modify the
five-year-old law. Public Education Network says students, parents,
and community residents are affected by NCLB, but they're often left
out of the policy debate. PEN’s hearings revealed that students,
parents, and community members agree on a number of issues
pertaining to NCLB:
|
1.
|
Test-based accountability is poorly implemented and
narrows curriculum, instruction, and student learning; |
|
2.
|
NCLB and state measurement and reporting systems are
confusing and hard to interpret; |
|
3.
|
Tests given to students with disabilities and to
English-language learners are unfair; |
|
4.
|
Test scores often demoralize teachers and require strong
instructional leadership to improve; |
|
5.
|
Turning low-performing schools around is a better
strategy than allowing students to transfer to better schools; |
|
6.
|
NCLB’s required communication with parents and students
is inefficient and ineffective; and |
|
7.
|
Funding is inadequate to ensure that all students,
especially those in low-income schools, have equal access to educational
programs and resources. |
Fixing schools is supposed to be about kids, as pointed out by
Washington Post reporter/columnist Jay Mathews. His point? Stop
fiddling with the law, and instead spend federal funds to find
low-income schools that work, figure out how and why they work,
and use those lessons to help others improve.
SHOULD KIDS SERVE TIME FOR SKIPPING SCHOOL?
Fifteen-year-old Tam Chau is just one of hundreds of King County
(Seattle) students who have been jailed for missing school; since
1997, the county has jailed truant youths 974 times. Public outcry
led to the creation of a set of laws designed to assist parents with
uncontrollable children. Before the new laws took effect, reports
Huan Hsu for Seattle Weekly, each school district enforced truancy
differently -- which is to say that they often didn't. If after a
court referral the student fails to follow the court's instructions,
the court can find him in contempt and send him to detention for up
to seven days. Guidance counselor Marion Howard says her attempts to
get kids back in school run the gamut. She conducts home visits,
holds parent-teacher conferences, changes schedules, and connects
students with counseling, mentoring, and tutoring. She's even gone
to students' houses and set up alarm clocks. "You name it, we do
it," says Howard. "Sending them downtown is not the first thing we
do: It's months and months of trying. The one thing we can't do is
take these kids home, parent them, and bring them back to school the
next day." One of the best ideas researchers have seen is what
California, Florida, Rhode Island, and Maryland do with truants:
They delay driver's license eligibility.
$6 MILLION FUND BACKS EDUCATION REFORM
ORGANIZING EFFORTS
Communities for Public Education Reform (CPER), a coalition of
grassroots education organizing groups backed by 40 local and
national funders, seeks to improve education for students by giving
community residents a stronger voice in shaping the policies that
affect their public schools. Local groups in Chicago, Denver,
Philadelphia and New Jersey are receiving $2.3 million in support
through a series of new grants and technical assistance announced
yesterday. CPER partners include: two Denver groups working on
education organizing; two Chicago coalitions working to reduce
high-school drop out rates and pioneer new strategies for developing
and supporting teachers in high-poverty schools; six New Jersey
organizing and partner advocacy groups; and, eight Philadelphia
organizing and allied groups that collaborate through the city’s
Cross-City Campaign for School Reform. In New Jersey, the Paterson
Education Fund, a local education fund, will serve as the managing
partner on the grant and host the program's coordinating staff. For
more information on this effort, contact: Julie K. Kohler, Ph.D.,
Program Manager & Director of Evaluation, Public Interest Projects,
(212) 764-1508, ext. 231, or email her at the above link.
GOVERNMENT BY BAKE SALE: DONATIONS HELP PAY
FOR BASIC SERVICES
What's wrong with wealthy families in La Canada Flintridge, San
Marino and other communities holding constant fundraisers to pay for
the unfunded needs of their local public schools -- drama societies
and marching bands and that sort of thing? Or with parents having to
go out and purchase body armor on their own so that their sons are
protected in Iraq? What's so wrong, asks Ezra Klein in the Los
Angeles Times, with hollowing out the public sector and replacing it
with a pay-as-you-go society? It is the natural endpoint, after all,
of the privatization craze, of the gospel of tax cuts and of the
smaller-government-is-better-government mentality that has been on
the ascendancy in the U.S. for nearly 25 years. How has this come to
pass? As the old adage goes, when the gods want to punish you, they
give you what you want. Conservatives talk a lot about government
failure, but over the last few years, it's really we who have failed
government, depriving it of the revenue, the conscientious
management and the attention needed for it to succeed. A new Pew
Research Center poll finds that public support for a societal safety
net and for government protections is at its highest levels in more
than a decade -- which suggests that Americans don't think bake
sales are the way to fund their schools or that corporations are
really who they want subsidizing law enforcement. And in recent
elections, the once popular "Taxpayer's Bill of Rights" amendments
that seemed so unstoppable a decade ago are being rejected and, in
Colorado, repealed, as voters finally tire of paying the costs in
broken infrastructure and insufficient public services.
CAN DEAF & HARD OF HEARING STUDENTS SUCCEED IN
MAINSTREAM CLASSROOMS?
The purpose of this commentary by Shirin Antia in Teachers College
Record is to discuss the issues surrounding the educational
placement of deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) students and puncture the
myth that DHH students in general education classrooms are doomed to
academic failure. Presently, about 63 percent of DHH students attend
general education classes for all or part of their school day.
Despite their difficulties in accessing classroom communication,
they have higher achievement scores than students attending special
schools. Although one reason for the increased achievement may be
the difference in degree of hearing loss, other contributors of
increased achievement include access to the general curriculum, high
expectations for achievement, and the availability of quality
support services. Finally, it is likely that a combination of
facilitators, rather than a single "magic bullet" accounts for the
success of DHH students placed in general education classrooms.
EDUCATING NEWCOMERS: ENSURING THAT IMMIGRANTS
SUCCEED IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Over the past two years, a national debate on immigration has once
again heated up. But for the more than eight million immigrants and
children of immigrants in U.S. schools, and for the educators and
community leaders who work with them every day, the issue is not
rhetorical -- it is very real. What is the best way to educate
newcomers? And how can schools employ the assets that newcomers
bring to schools? The latest issue of Voices in Urban Education from
the Annenberg Institute for School Reform offers five perspectives
on these questions and suggests ways that schools can ensure that
immigrant students succeed.
GETTING SERIOUS ABOUT PLAY AS A LEARNING TOOL IN CLASSROOMS
For Georgianne Walsh, of New Jersey, a beloved raccoon puppet known
as Chester acts as the official greeter for her kindergarten
students every morning. Amy Wallace, who teaches in New York City,
created a puppet named Maya about whom her first graders became so
concerned that Wallace purchased a tent for her to sleep in at
night. In Las Cruces, N.M. Toni Gross's preschoolers are endlessly
intrigued by a mouth-shaped puppet named Besos she uses to
demonstrate oral movement when teaching speech and language. These
puppets, simple hinged paper devices, were all inspired by an
innovative website called Puppetools.com. Brainchild of a
boundary-busting educator named Jeffrey Peyton, Puppetools provides
a wide array of resources designed to introduce teachers and
students to a stimulating world of educational play centered on
puppetry. "When play enters the classroom, it transforms
everything," says Peyton. "And when the play involves puppets, the
power opens up and moves into the hands of the students." This is a
man who is serious about play. Peyton feels that the whole concept
has been marginalized in public education, mostly because so many
teachers are intimidated by it, writes Burr Snider in Edutopia
magazine. "The idea of communicating playfully using a device like a
puppet is just too far out for most adults, and I think that speaks
volumes about the classroom environment," Peyton says. "Lots of
teachers strive for standardized behavior, and I think children
sense this deeply and suffer from it, from prekindergarten on into
high school."
THE STING OF THE SPELLING BEE
Spelling bees are hot. Broadway plays host to one nearly every night
with an award-winning musical about six overachieving spellers in
"The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee." Hollywood has embraced
them too: "Akeelah" would be nothing without her "Bee," not to
mention "Bee Season." And the Scripps National Spelling Bee, set for
May 30 and 31, is popular enough for the finals to be televised in
prime time for a second year. As popular as spelling bees have
become, academic researchers say many schools are giving spelling
short shrift. That, they say, is because some teachers don't believe
great spelling is necessary to pass the high-stakes standardized
tests that drive public education. And because many don't know how
to teach it. Some wind up substituting spelling competitions for
real instruction and insist that students memorize lists of words
for a weekly test, reports Valerie Strauss in the Washington Post.
That is no way to help students understand what words mean, experts
say.
THE ORIGINS OF TODAY’S STUDENT LOAN
CONTROVERSY
The student loan industry has been beset in recent months by
revelations of unethical marketing tactics and questionable ties
between lenders and both college administrators and government
officials. In a new report, Education Sector Policy Analyst Erin
Dillon explains how a small, government-sponsored program has
evolved over four decades into a vast, aggressive, and highly
lucrative industry. No company has been more ambitious than Sallie
Mae, the industry's dominant player, and the story of Sallie Mae's
rise from a government-regulated niche enterprise to a fully
private, multi-billion-dollar corporation goes a long way toward
explaining how and why the student loan industry has landed at the
center of controversy today. Dillon chronicles Sallie Mae's rise in
the wake of skyrocketing college costs and escalating student
borrowing, explaining how the company's relentless expansion has
combined with aggressive marketing, less-than-rigorous federal
oversight, and the industry's increasing complexity to create a
climate that's ripe for the sort of industry wrongdoing that has
emerged in recent months.
DO STATE EDUCATION AGENCIES HAVE THE TOOLS
NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND?
The Center on Education Policy (CEP) has released a new report on
the capacity of state educational agencies to carry out the No Child
Left Behind Act. The report, "Educational Architects: Do State
Education Agencies Have the Tools Necessary to Implement NCLB?" is
the second report in a series of CEP publications on the
implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act that will be issued
this year. An analysis of survey data from all 50 states and
interview data of 15 high-ranking state education officials from 11
states revealed four major capacity challenges:
|
1.
|
limitations in staffing and infrastructure; |
|
2.
|
inadequate federal and state funding; |
|
3.
|
a lack of sufficient guidance and technical support from
the U.S. Department of Education; and |
|
4.
|
barriers in NCLB and within state education agencies.
|
IS YOUR SCHOOL GIVING OUT PERSONAL
INFORMATION?
As parents, we are given the responsibility and right to protect
our children’s privacy. Parents retain the right to expect
schools to keep students’ records, addresses, and personal
information confidential. It is the law. Most administrators,
faculty, and staff adhere to the law. Our children’s rights are
protected. We feel secure. It may surprise and shock you to know
how unprotected your child can be, writes Kristen Houghton for
BellaOnline. In Ventura County, Calif., a mother of elementary
age children was shocked to know that their names, addresses,
phone numbers, and any other contact information, were taken
from student emergency cards and published in a school directory
booklet put out by the local PTA. The booklet also listed the
names of siblings and other family members. Added to this
information was a complete classroom roster, including classroom
numbers, and teachers’ names. You could easily find out not only
where each child lived but what classroom they are in and their
grade level. In today’s world, where we are more aware of child
predators than ever before, writes Houghton, this seems
unconscionable. If the administration and those parents who see
nothing wrong with this practice truly believe that the
information never could get into the hands of a child molester,
they are either naive or just plain brain-dead. |