|
THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF MOTHERHOOD
If the typical stay-at-home mother in the United States were paid
for her work as a housekeeper, cook and psychologist, among other
roles, she would earn $138,095 a year, according to new research.
This reflected a 3 percent raise from last year's $134,121,
according to Salary.com Inc., Waltham, Mass.-based compensation
experts. The 10 jobs listed as comprising a mother's work were
housekeeper, cook, day care center teacher, laundry machine
operator, van driver, facilities manager, janitor, computer
operator, chief executive officer and psychologist. The study
indicated the typical mother puts in a 92-hour work week, working 40
hours at base pay and 52 hours overtime. A mother who holds a
full-time job outside the home would earn an additional $85,939 for
the work she does at home. Last year she would have earned $85,876
for her at-home work. Salary.com compiled the online responses of
26,000 stay-at-home mothers and 14,000 mothers who also work outside
the home. Happy Mother’s Day from Public Education Network!
SCHOOLS CANNOT DO IT BY THEMSELVES
There is little debate about the importance of community and public
involvement in public schools. Years of research have shown that
parent and community involvement in schools improves student
achievement. When parents and the wider community work with schools,
students benefit in concrete and measurable ways. Student scores on
standardized tests are higher. Where civic engagement in community
affairs in general is high, teachers report higher levels of
parental support and lower levels of student misbehavior. In October
2006, The Education Alliance, Public Education Network and The
Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation released the first statewide Civic
Index on quality public education. West Virginia was one of four
pilots for a national Civic Index that measured the social capital
and civic capacity of West Virginia and the nation. The 10
categories included in the Civic Index were developed by asking the
public what they deemed crucial for a community in order to have a
quality public education. The categories the public selected might
surprise you. They were: education leadership of elected officials;
tolerance and inclusiveness; active parents; strong civic
organizations; performance data about the school/district;
partnerships with higher education; knowledge of and voting for
school board; active business community; youth involvement; and
media coverage. This article by Becky Ceperley, president and CEO of
the Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation, published in the West
Virginia Gazette, highlights findings from the civic index. As our
civic organizations are looking for projects to undertake, look to
your local schools. Inquire about how your organization may partner
with schools. As voters, we need to make sure we ask candidates
running for all public offices what their stances are on public
education. We need to raise our involvement with public education to
a higher level. Our relationship with public education is a highly
interdependent one. We need our schools to educate our young people
and stimulate our economy. Schools need our support to survive. Our
schools work hard to provide a high quality education for our youth,
but they can't do it alone.
STATEMENT OF ETHICS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERS
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) has
released a new code of ethical conduct for school leaders. The AASA
Statement of Ethics for Educational Leaders outlines 12 key
standards for school system leaders. The document affirms that the
educational leader:
|
1.
|
Makes the education and well-being of students the
fundamental value of all decision making; |
|
2.
|
Fulfills all professional duties with honesty and
integrity and always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner; |
|
3.
|
Supports the principle of due process and protects the
civil and human rights of all individuals; |
|
4.
|
Implements local, state and national laws; |
|
5.
|
Advises the school board and implements the board's
policies and administrative rules and regulations; |
|
6.
|
Pursues appropriate measures to correct those laws,
policies and regulations that are not consistent with sound educational
goals or that are not in the best interest of children; |
|
7.
|
Avoids using his or her position for personal gain
through political, social, religious, economic or other influences; |
|
8.
|
Accepts academic degrees or professional certification
only from accredited institutions; |
|
9.
|
Maintains the standards and seeks to improve the
effectiveness of the profession through research and continuing
professional development; |
|
10.
|
Honors all contracts until fulfillment, release or
dissolution mutually agreed upon by all parties; |
|
11.
|
Accepts responsibility and accountability for one’s own
actions and behaviors; and |
|
12.
|
Commits to serving others above self. |
MAKING SURE KIDS KNOW THAT ADULTS CARE
Few lost opportunities in education result in the tragedy of the
Virginia Tech murders. We have yet to learn about the lost
opportunities for helping the shooter in his school experiences
long before he got to Virginia Tech. That this young man could
have been passed along, with the behavior he exhibited, from
grade to grade in his earlier school years is incredible. Yet,
it can and does happen, writes Dorothy Rich in The Sacramento
Bee. In a new study on high school students and their reasons
for dropping out, the traditional reasons about family issues
and jobs came up. But 24 percent of the students said they had
the feeling that no adults in the school cared about them. This
sense of not being cared about is devastating to kids, and it
should not have to happen. Caring is not only about the
so-called harder things such as academic standards and testing
accountability. It also is about student perceptions and
feelings. And these are not soft, touchy things. These are the
hard underpinnings of why schools are identified by many as the
biggest disappointments in their lives. We have become so busy
with the mechanisms of schooling, we forget the humanity that is
basic to good education. To their credit, a number of fellow
students and teachers tried to reach the Virginia Tech senior,
but their efforts were not sustained, coordinated and supported.
The killer's video showed very clearly that he, mistaken or not,
never felt cared about as a person. Schools are really large
families, with function and dysfunction. Teachers, now, most
stretched to their limits, have to be given the time and
resources to reclaim lost opportunities for caring. Even cool
adolescents need to sense that adults care. Why is it that in
the movement to reform education we keep forgetting that
students' hearts, not just their minds, make all the difference
in what they learn and how they perform? Teachers need to be
given what it takes to reach children as individuals, and
teachers need to know that caring is part and parcel of the work
of education ... and that the public understands and supports
this fully.
GOVERNMENT SLOW TO ADDRESS SCHOOL BUS
EMISSIONS
Day in and day out, children across the U.S. are riding to school on
aging buses, breathing what some activists say is a dangerous brew
of pollutants up to five times dirtier than the air outside. It is a
situation that Congress and many states have sought to fix in recent
years. In fact, in 2005 federal lawmakers passed a measure to
replace or retrofit the dirtiest diesel engines across the nation.
But little has been done, reports the Associated Press. Around the
country, state officials are struggling to find the money to carry
out clean school bus initiatives. And Congress has yet to deliver on
the $1 billion it promised over five years to help states clean up
diesel fleets, including school buses. Breathing high concentrations
of diesel emissions -- known as particulates -- can cause minor
ailments such as headaches, wheezing and dizziness. But studies also
have found the contaminants can do more serious damage. Recent
studies by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other
groups link the emissions to asthma and lung cancer. Two types of
filters are available to reduce the most dangerous emissions on
older buses. Diesel particulate filters -- which are installed in
place of mufflers at an estimated cost of $7,500 each -- can reduce
tailpipe emissions by at least 85 percent. Closed crankcase
filtration systems, which go under the hood and cost $700, can
reduce engine soot by about 90 percent. A bus can be fitted with one
or both filters. An estimated 390,000 diesel school buses are on the
road in the U.S., according to the EPA. Most newer buses were
manufactured to meet stricter emissions guidelines and do not need
filters. But about one-third of the nation's diesel school bus
fleet, or more than 100,000 buses, were manufactured before 1990 and
are big polluters, according to the EPA. Researchers say older buses
also let lots of emissions enter through doors and windows. The
longer the ride, the more harmful to children, they say. Congress
passed the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act, a bipartisan initiative
that authorized $1 billion to help states clean up diesel fleets.
But states have seen none of that money. The Bush administration
proposed modest funding for DERA in its last two budget requests,
but Congress has not acted.
THE PROMISES & PROBLEMS OF PRESIDENT BUSH’S
EDUCATION POLICY
As Congress begins to consider reauthorization of the Bush
Administration's 2002 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), The Nation
asked Linda Darling-Hammond, a leading education expert, to examine
the law, its consequences and prospects for improving the
legislation. The Nation also asked for responses from sociologist
and author Pedro Noguera, longtime educator, and National Urban
League vice president Velma L. Cobb and senior New York University
scholar and veteran school principal Deborah Meier. As
Darling-Hammond writes, "We badly need a national policy that
enables schools to meet the intellectual demands of the 21st
century. More fundamentally, we need to pay off the educational debt
to disadvantaged students that has accrued over centuries of unequal
access to quality education." As Noguera responds, "Darling-Hammond
makes it clear that there are many problems associated with NCLB
that have undermined the benefits it was intended to deliver. ...
Despite its failings, two basic goals of NCLB remain important:
Students should be educated under higher academic standards, and
those responsible for educating them should be held accountable."
WHY THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IS
UNSALVAGEABLE
Much of the talk in favor of the No Child Left Behind Act’s
reauthorization is centered around two contentions: that the federal
law needs only some tweaking to be made right, such as shifting to a
"value added" or "growth" method of charting progress; and that,
once tweaked, it must be fully funded to be effective. Key Democrats
in Congress seem committed to a continuation of the law’s basic
provisions, as do many of their Republican counterparts and the Bush
administration. These proponents argue for staying the course
because, they assert, left to their own devices states and districts
will not push their schools to eliminate achievement gaps, or move
all students to and beyond "proficiency." The intentions behind the
legislation may be good, but no amount of tweaking will fix several
fatal flaws. In part, these flaws are inherent in the law’s
unrealistic goals, which, because they can't be met, set schools up
to fail, writes Eric Schaps in Education Week. And in part, the
flaws are inherent in the law’s basic strategy for realizing its
goals: high-stakes testing. That strategy ignores the primary
reasons for the inequities that schools are supposed to redress, and
also causes collateral damage of several kinds. In this hard-hitting
commentary, Schaps describes the law’s major goal of getting all
students to proficiency by 2014 a "pipe dream." He also observes
that requiring poorly funded districts serving needy students to
somehow produce achievement levels comparable to those of the most
affluent districts serving the most privileged students is nothing
short of victimizing the victim. Our schools no doubt can and should
improve. To do so, they need adequate time, equitable resources, and
the public’s support. The No Child Left Behind Act is the wrong
vehicle for facilitating such improvement, concludes Schaps. Perhaps
we should return to being guided less by federal policymakers and
more by local stakeholders.
STUDENTS LEARN TO THRIVE BY NOT BEING
BYSTANDERS
According to a recent study, a kid's academic success may depend on
whether he believes in his own ability to grow smarter. Researchers
divided poorly performing middle-school students into two groups and
arranged for kids in both groups to receive intense, remedial
instruction. However, those in the second group also were taught to
understand intelligence as an expanding opportunity, rather than an
unchangeable destiny, writes Karen Utley, the mother of eight
children, in the Salem (Ore.) Statesman Journal. After several
months, testing revealed slightly improved scores in the first
group, but soaring success among students in the second. Educators
probably weren't surprised to hear that student confidence predicts
scholastic achievement. Tackling the rigors of an advanced
curriculum requires kids to be active, enthusiastic learners who are
convinced that their intelligence can grow and that their capacity
for learning is enhanced even as they learn. On the other hand,
students who assume their intellectual abilities were fixed at birth
approach education passively, coming to school with the attitude,
appearance and expectations of detached observers. It is critical
that we teach kids to redefine personal intelligence as a power they
can control, and over which they have personal responsibility.
WHEN IS A SCHOOL DANGEROUS?
Under the six-year-old No Child Left Behind Act, each state must
define a "persistently dangerous" school and allow parents to
transfer their children out of them. But at Milwaukee's Fritsche
Middle School, 187 calls to police over a recent six-month period
did not make the school persistently dangerous under Wisconsin's
definition. The fact that many of Milwaukee's high schools do not
come close to earning the designation highlights dramatic
inconsistencies in the way the federal safety provision is applied,
a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel analysis shows. The analysis also found
that the dangerous schools provision does little to foster
accountability on school safety issues -- and could actually
discourage accountability in some schools and states. Milwaukee does
not have a single dangerous school, reports Sarah Carr. Neither does
Chicago. Nor Boston. Nor Los Angeles. All told, 40 schools
throughout the country were labeled dangerous at the start of this
school year -- including nine in Philadelphia. None is in Wisconsin.
The states and schools that have been the most rigorous and thorough
in reporting and defining violence wind up paying a price for it. In
many cases, the schools lose dozens of students to ones that are
presumed to be safer.
IS ENTREPRENEURSHIP SERVING THE BEST INTERESTS OF PUBLIC
EDUCATION?
Market-based education reforms are controversial with unclear
outcomes regarding student achievement and service quality.
Advocates for these reforms claim that overhauling entrenched public
education bureaucracies is a necessary step toward providing
students with better learning opportunities. However, critics worry
that an increasing emphasis on entrepreneurship in education may
place financial and political goals ahead of student needs. A new
paper by Patrick McGuinn surveys the current policy landscape and
describes how to build support for charter schools, alternative
teacher certification, and supplemental education services. The
author observes that even after being authorized these education
reforms often face substantial barriers that limit their
implementation. Policy entrepreneurs are described as essential
agents of change who continue to push for desired policy outcomes.
Further research is required to determine the impact of such
advocacy organizations on public education.
COMMUNITY COLLEGES & TEACHER PREPARATION: ROLES, ISSUES &
OPPORTUNITIES
The Education Commission of the States (ECS) announces the release
of an issue paper by Tricia Coulter and Bruce Vandal that explores
the expanding and evolving role community colleges are playing in
teacher preparation to help meet the ongoing demand for quality
teachers. The paper describes the forces shaping education policy
and practice around teacher preparation, and offers suggestions on
how community colleges can capitalize on their unique attributes to
meet critical workforce demand in local and regional communities to
positively affect the field of teacher education. Highlighted
recommendations from the report include:
|
1.
|
Teacher preparation should be viewed as a four-year
process that includes content and pedagogical training throughout the
four-years; |
|
2.
|
Program and course development should be a collaborative
process including representation from universities, community colleges
and the K-12 sector |
|
3.
|
Each state department of education should encourage
ongoing collaboration and communication among legislators, community
colleges, universities and the K-12 sector on how community college
teacher preparation can be used to improve the quality of teacher
preparation and ameliorate teacher shortages; and |
|
4.
|
Policymakers and institution leaders should consider
providing resources to community colleges and K-12 school districts to
support customized training for teachers through contracts and/or
partnerships between community colleges and school districts. |
ELEPHANTS IN THE ROOM: MAINSTREAM COVERAGE
OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Gregory Michie, a teacher and teacher educator for 16 years in
Chicago, looks at how mainstream media reports on urban public
schools, and finds that the real story is often what goes
unsaid. Michie examined newspaper, magazine and television
coverage about Chicago schools -- and was appalled. It was not
only that the coverage was so often negative, according to his
article in Rethinking Schools. More troubling was the tendency
to gloss over or bury stories that deserve front page headlines
or special reports. Stories often focus on the failure of an
individual student or parent. Rarely do stories look in depth at
questionable NCLB mandates, the lack of funding, or the sheer
folly of some school policies.
MAKING SENSE OF CHARTER SCHOOL STUDIES: A
REPORTER’S GUIDE
With the rush to release findings and the online availability of
papers, the job of evaluating education research often falls to
education reporters. The National Charter School Research Project’s
latest publication, Making Sense of Charter School Studies: A
Reporter’s Guide, is intended to help members of the media interpret
charter school achievement studies. It provides select questions to
help reporters assess the quality and applicability of a study’s
findings. While the guide is catered towards studies of charter
schools, it can be used to interpret other education research as
well. A database of national charter school statistics, summaries of
recent charter school research, and other reports from NCSRP can
also be found in addition to free report downloads at the above
link.
HELP STUDENTS UNDERSTAND AFTERMATH & SOCIAL IMPACT OF HURRICANE
KATRINA
Spike Lee and HBO’s epic documentary, "When the Levees Broke: A
Requiem in Four Acts," is the centerpiece of a new curriculum
package that will be available this fall for high school, college
and community educators. The award-winning documentary will be
accompanied by a multi-disciplinary curriculum guide, "Teaching The
Levees: A Curriculum for Democratic Dialogue and Civic Engagement to
Accompany the HBO Documentary Film Event," published and distributed
by Teachers College Press. Available free to educators, thanks to a
grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, the curriculum package, which
includes a complete version of the documentary in a two-disk DVD set
and a complementary curriculum guide, can be requested at the link
below while supplies last.
SILENCE OF SCHOOL OFFICIALS PUT PARENTS AT
ARM’S LENGTH
Schools nationwide are calling on parents to get involved, reports
Jay Mathews in the Washington Post. The Maryland State Board of
Education endorsed a broad range of family outreach initiatives in a
2005 report that called public education "a shared responsibility."
Yet some Maryland parents and elsewhere have discovered limits on
the get-involved policy when they ask questions about individual
teachers, whether those queries are about alleged abuse of students
or a decision to fire a popular instructor. School officials said
they are required to hold back information because of privacy laws,
union contracts and potential lawsuits. Some acknowledged that a
more open policy would help families handle the repercussions of
incidents involving teachers. But the officials said there is little
they can do.
WHY DO TEACHERS QUIT?
A new study from the Center for Teacher Quality at California State
University boldly states that bureaucracy is the single biggest
reason why teachers stop teaching, even more important than pay. The
researchers surveyed more than 1,900 current and former teachers in
an effort to understand why 18,000 California teachers quit every
year. |
"Grants
to Encourage Strong School-Community Relationships"
Principals across the country have good ideas about how to connect
schools and communities and often just need a little support to
raise test scores, keep schools safe, and create effective learning
communities for all children. To support these principals, the
National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) and
MetLife Foundation will provide a grant to up to 30 schools and a
toolkit of resources to develop programs committed to heightening
community leadership, communication, ownership and involvement in
the school with the goal of improving achievement for all students.
Projects will take place during the 2007-08 school year. Examples of
past projects may be seen at www.publicengagement.com/dream. Grant
applications are due June 8, 2007.
"Photo,
Essay and Poetry Contest Celebrates Our Sense of Wonder and Love of
Nature"
To honor the late preservationist and ecologist Rachel Carson, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Generations United, and the
Rachel Carson Council, Inc., announce a photo, essay, and poetry
contest "that best expresses the sense of wonder that you feel for
the sea, the night sky, forests, birds, wildlife, and all that is
beautiful to your eyes." In the book, The Sense of Wonder (written
in the 1950s and published in a magazine in 1956), Carson used
lyrical passages about the beauty of nature and the joy of helping
children develop a sense of wonder and love of nature. Maximum
Award: publication on the websites of EPA, Aging Initiative,
Generations United, and Rachel Carson Council, Inc. Eligibility:
entries must be joint projects involving a person under age 18 and a
person age 50 or older. Deadline: June 15, 2007.
"Grants
to Encourage Use of Outdoor Nature-based Classrooms"
The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation gives grants to
organizations to start or expand Nature of Learning programs in
their communities. Grants support start-up expenses associated with
new programs and give continued support to existing Nature of
Learning programs. The Nature of Learning is the National Wildlife
Refuge System’s community-based environmental education initiative
that seeks to use National Wildlife Refuges as outdoor classrooms to
promote greater understanding of local conservation issues;
encourage interdisciplinary approaches to learning that enhance
student academic achievement; use field experiences and student-led
stewardship projects to connect classroom lessons to real world
issues; and partner local schools, community groups, natural
resource professionals and local businesses. Maximum Award: varies.
Eligibility: Programs involving a partnership among a local school(s),
community group (e.g., Refuge Support Group), and National Wildlife
Refuge. Deadline: June 15, 2007.
"Grants
to Encourage Reduction of Graffiti in the Community"
The Graffiti Hurts National Grant Program aims to help communities
kick-start or add to local graffiti prevention programs. Grant funds
may be used for one-time projects with the potential to reduce
graffiti in the community. Maximum Award: $2,000. Eligibility:
501(c)3 organizations, including neighborhood groups, crime
prevention associations, civic clubs or organizations, and other
nonprofit groups; youth groups/schools; police departments or other
law enforcement agencies; city, county, state and federal government
agencies, or subdivisions within these agencies. Deadline: June 29,
2007.
"Staples
Foundation for Learning Grants Support Job Skills and Education"
The Staples Foundation for Learning provides funding to programs
that support or provide job skills and/or education for all people,
with an emphasis on disadvantaged youth. Maximum Award: $25,000.
Eligibility: 501(c)3 organizations. Deadline: August 3, 2007.
For a detailed listing of EXISTING GRANT
OPPORTUNITIES (updated each week), visit:
http://www.publiceducation.org/newsblast_grants.asp |