|
NEVER MIND THE DOOMSAYERS; U.S. SCHOOLS ARE
DOING FINE
The usual hand-wringing accompanied the U.S. Department of
Education's release late last year of statistics on how U.S.
students performed on international tests. How will the United
States compete in the global economy, went the lament, when our
students lag behind the likes of Singapore and Hong Kong in math and
science? American fourth-graders ranked 12th in the world on one
international math test, and eighth-graders were 14th. Is this
further evidence of the failure of the nation's schools? Not
exactly, says the editors of The Washington Post. In fact, a closer
look at how our kids perform against the international "competition"
suggests that this story line may contain more than a few myths:
|
1.
|
"U.S. students rate poorly compared with those in the
rest of the world." This is true only if you cherry-pick the results;
|
|
2.
|
"U.S. students are falling behind." Actually, American
students are mostly improving, or at worst holding their own; |
|
3.
|
"U.S. students won't be well prepared for the modern work
force." This myth has been bandied around since at least the turn of the
19th century by business leaders who blame schools for inadequately
preparing workers; and |
|
4.
|
"Bad schooling has undermined America's competitiveness."
The U.S. economy has grown "faster than any other advanced economy" over
the past two decades. |
A
dynamic economy is much more than the sum of its test scores.
It's part of a culture that rewards innovation and risk-taking,
and values unconventional problem-solving.
MORE THAN A HORSE RACE: INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
TEST COMPARISONS
According to a new report from the Center for Public Education, much
of what the public hears about the performance of U.S. kids against
their international peers comes from one of two camps: the Chicken
Littles who claim our kids are failing and the nation’s economic sky
is falling as a result; or the Dr. Panglosses who dismiss the scores
as irrelevant because American schools are different and truly the
best of all possible worlds. The reality is more complex: U.S. kids
aren't number one on any international test, but they're not failing
either. And our performance ranges from mediocre to good according
to the subject area and the age of the test-takers. This guide
attempts to show a more complete picture of international
assessments and what we can learn from them. It provides an overview
of the international tests administered to students and adults
across the globe, and addresses how these tests are developed, who
takes them, and how we should interpret the results. The report also
summarizes the results of the major assessments in reading,
mathematics and science.
LOCAL EDUCATION FUND HANDBOOK
Local education funds are independent, nonprofit organizations at
the center of reform efforts to improve public education and
reconnect people to the institution of public education. In
developing this handbook, PEN drew upon the experience of almost 100
LEFs, many of whom are pioneers and leading innovators in education
reform. The handbook begins with a brief introduction to the
structure and mission of Public Education Network and then goes on
to provide step-by-step information on how to establish and run a
local education fund. It is designed to be a reference for those
starting an LEF, as well as an operational tool and checklist for
leaders of existing LEFs. Specific information includes: How to
start an LEF; Steps to organize a 501c3; Creating a strong board of
directors; Sample mission statements; Building partnerships;
Budgets; Fundraising tips; and much more. Click the above link to
order your copy today.
LAKE WOBEGON, U.S.A. -- WHERE ALL THE CHILDREN
ARE ABOVE AVERAGE
When her son came home from middle school with a report card showing
he'd passed North Carolina’s year-end algebra test, Margaret Carnes
believed he had the foundation he needed for high school. Then she
met with his teacher, who cautioned her not to be too confident. By
the state’s yardstick, students had to answer correctly fewer than
half the questions to pass. In some grades, they can flub two-thirds
of the questions and still be marked "proficient." It can be a harsh
wake-up call for children and parents alike. Students are told they
are where they're supposed to be academically, but a rude awakening
awaits them in high school. "It compels one to ask the question,
have they been prepared?" said Carnes, now managing director for
Charlotte Advocates for Education, a local education fund pushing
for higher state standards. It’s a problem of long standing in U.S.
public education. While international assessments confirm that
American students lag behind those in several other countries in
science and math, many school districts and states keep telling
parents that their children, like those in Lake Wobegon, Garrison
Keillor’s hometown of fable, are all above average. Differences
between state and federal tests are to be expected, writes Pauline
Vu at Stateline.org, yet some gaps appear as wide as the Grand
Canyon. Mississippi reported that at least 79 percent of its
fourth-graders were at grade level in math in 2005, yet on the
federal test, only 19 percent were proficient or better.
A $50 MILLION DAY FOR ARKANSAS HIGH SCHOOL
GRADUATES
In one of the most generous programs of its kind anywhere in the
country, an Arkansas oil company announced it is putting up $50
million for college scholarships for nearly all high school
graduates in its working-class hometown over the next 20 years.
Students at an El Dorado High School assembly screamed and applauded
when Murphy Oil, the nation's ninth-largest refiner, unveiled the
program. Some wept, and one made the sign of the cross. Murphy Oil
said it wants to increase the number of students who attend college
and perhaps attract new businesses to El Dorado, with the
scholarships a selling point. It said it also hopes the program will
help create better jobs here for students to come back to after
graduating from college. The program begins with this spring's
graduating class. El Dorado High, the sole high school in town, has
about 250 graduates each year, about 65 percent of whom go to
college. Under the El Dorado Promise program, students can use the
scholarship money at an Arkansas institution or at any out-of-state
college. But the annual scholarships are capped at the highest
resident tuition rate at an Arkansas public university, currently
$6,010. Students who attended school in El Dorado since kindergarten
are eligible for the full amount; students who attended for all four
years of high school get 65 percent. Those who have been in the
district for less than four years are ineligible. "We are committed
to making El Dorado a great place to live and work, and we created
the Promise to further invest in El Dorado's greatest resource: our
children," said Claiborne Deming, president and CEO of Murphy Oil
Corporation, and chairman of the board of the El Dorado Education
Foundation, a local education fund.
HOLLYWOOD DISTORTS IMAGES OF TEACHING
The great misconception of Hollywood films about education is not
that actual schools are more chaotic and decrepit -- many schools in
poor neighborhoods are clean and orderly yet still don't have enough
teachers or money for supplies. No, the most dangerous message such
films promote is that what schools really need are heroes. This is
the Myth of the Great Teacher, writes Tom Moore, a teacher, in the
New York Times. Films like "Freedom Writers" portray teachers more
as missionaries than professionals, eager to give up their lives and
comfort for the benefit of others, without need of compensation. In
"Freedom Writers," Erin Gruwell sacrifices money, time and even her
marriage for her job. Her behavior is not represented as obsessive
or self-destructive, but driven -- necessary, even. She is forced
into making these sacrifices by the aggressive neglect of the
school’s administrators, who won't even let her take books from the
bookroom. The film applauds Ms. Gruwell’s dedication, but also
implies that she has no other choice. In order to be a good teacher,
she has to be a hero. "Freedom Writers," like all teacher movies
this side of "The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie," is presented as a
celebration of teaching, but its message is that poor students need
only love, idealism and martyrdom.
SOUTH AUSTIN PRESCHOOL DOESN'T MAKE CHILDREN
LEARN THEIR ABCs
Habibi’s Hutch, a Texas preschool celebrating its 25th anniversary
this year, calls itself a "Natural Childlife Preserve." It doesn't
make children sit down and learn their ABCs or separate them into
different classes or even say "please" or "thank you," said Andrew
Urbanus, the school's director. Children ages 18 months to 4 years
spend as much time as possible outdoors in a huge backyard filled
with swing sets, sand piles, playhouses and toys learning how to get
along with each other, Urbanus said. If children can learn how to
talk to each other, or even yell when they're upset, then there will
be less biting and hitting, he said. Teachers constantly watch over
the students and help them talk to each other when fights begin, he
said. Children are allowed to cover their bodies with washable
paint, run around in their underwear and walk barefoot over the
sand-covered outdoor play area. Urbanus said no child has been
kicked out of Habibi's, which means "beloved one" in Arabic. More
than 60 children are enrolled at the school, reports Claire Osborn
in the American-Statesman. The young students perform their own
plays and have cooking classes with items such as pasta, salad and
banana bread on the menu once a week. There is a two-hour nap time
every day. Susan Empson, an associate math professor at the
University of Texas, said her children attended Habibi's Hutch 10
years ago. "My kids were well prepared for kindergarten even though
they hadn't had a curriculum that helped them learn to count,"
Empson said.
BUSH REINTRODUCES SCHOOL VOUCHER PLAN
President Bush is making another run at giving poor students private
school vouchers, but the Democratic-controlled Congress appears
ready to block that move. The White House unveiled details of the
president's proposals for overhauling the No Child Left Behind law,
which is up for renewal this year. The administration's proposal
calls for giving vouchers to students in schools that persistently
fail to meet progress goals set by the federal law. The
administration tried to include such a measure in the No Child Left
Behind law when it was first signed into law five years ago.
Democrats, then in the minority party, blocked the effort, reports
Nancy Zuckerbrod for the Associated Press. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy,
D-Mass., who became chairman of the Senate committee overseeing
education when Democrats took over Congress this year, said he would
work to keep vouchers out of the education law. Rep. George Miller,
a California Democrat who chairs the House committee overseeing
education, called the voucher proposal unacceptable. In addition to
promoting vouchers, the administration is calling for other changes
to the law. One would require states to publish a report card
showcasing how students do on state tests compared to a rigorous
national test. Such a move could put pressure on states to
strengthen their assessments and standards.
ARE YOU SMARTER THAN A FIFTH GRADER?
You will be delighted to know that Fox is coming out with a new show
this spring called "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?" Think of
"Fifth Grader" as the anti-"Jeopardy!" "While most game shows
measure how smart you are, this is a show that will measure how dumb
you are," said Fox Entertainment President Peter Liguori. Adults
will be asked questions taken from elementary school textbooks.
Actual elementary students will be on hand to help in case things
get too hairy, which they surely will if you have recently attempted
to help your fifth-grader with his or her homework. Your average
fifth-grader is way smarter than your average adult, and this is not
something we really need to be boasting about. Herald-Times
columnist, David Grimes, writes that "Fifth Grader" is going to
unnecessarily embarrass many adults. It's only going to prove that
most of us would benefit from taking fifth grade over again.
BIG TIME FUNDRAISING FOR TODAY’S SCHOOLS
Every generation of Americans has had to wrestle with the challenge
of educating its youth. This generation is no exception, and,
fortunately, we now know what it takes for all children to learn. We
know it takes qualified teachers, capable school leaders, supportive
learning environments, adequate resources, a rigorous curriculum,
high expectations linked to standards, fair diagnostic assessments,
and nonacademic supports that help students build strong minds and
healthy bodies. But one vital ingredient has been missing in this
formula for education excellence, and that ingredient is public
responsibility. This is where the talents, experience, and passion
of Stan Levenson are making an important difference for public
schools. As Levenson points out in his new book, private fundraising
for public schools has gone big time. School fundraising from
nonpublic sources has grown by leaps and bounds in the last few
decades, from schools seeking hundreds of dollars for individual
classroom projects to schools seeking millions of dollars for
long-delayed construction and to meet instructional needs that
clearly are not being met. This book makes a clear and compelling
case for the role that big-time fundraising will play in improving
all American schools. The book is a concise primer for classroom
teachers, parents, and administrators in their pursuit of outside
funding for their schools. But, as much as schools need money, they
need friends in local communities, in state houses, and in the White
House. Effective stewardship in public education requires citizens
to vote not only with their checkbooks but also in the ballot box,
writes PEN president and CEO, Wendy D. Puriefoy in the book’s
forward. As citizens, we take responsibility for our public schools
when we vote for the candidates and provide the public funding that
support and advance education equity. Read the forward, preface, and
first chapter for free at the above link.
THE 2006 ACHIEVEMENT GAP STUDY
Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA) researchers have released a
new study on the achievement gap. The achievement gap is the
difference between the academic performance of students in poor
versus wealthy schools and between minority and non-minority
students. The study revealed that for every group at every grade,
students from poor schools grew less than students from wealthy
schools and minority students exhibited less growth than their
non-minority peers. In general, students enrolled in high poverty
schools, African-American students and Hispanic students begin
school with lower skills, grow less academically during the school
year and lose more skill over the summer than their wealthier and
European-American peers. In the case of the African-American
students in these samples, the concern carries added emphasis. Their
rate of change over the two-year projection was the lowest of all
groups, suggesting that the achievement gap between student segments
remains a significant problem. "This study should be a wake up call
for educators, as it reveals real differences in student achievement
based on socio-economic status," said Allan Olson, president of NWEA.
"The use of growth data provides a clear picture of individual
student growth and helps inform educators on specifics areas where
students need focused instruction."
HELPING STATE
LEADERS SHAPE EDUCATION POLICY: WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH SAY?
The Education Commission of the States (ECS) has released the first
stage of a new online tool designed to help policymakers grappling
with the question, What does the research say? The initial launch of
the ECS Research Studies Database includes 12 studies on what's
needed to improve the education of students in high schools. Soon,
more studies will be added in other areas: teaching quality,
postsecondary completion, restructuring schools and more. Users can
search for studies by issue, author, organization, publisher and by
recency. For each study, the online tool features concise, bulleted
lists of findings and results, policy implications and
recommendations. All studies included have been carefully screened
and meet the following criteria:
|
1.
|
High-impact recommendations and policy implications; |
|
2.
|
Implications for state-level policy; |
|
3.
|
Interventions hold potential for replication; |
|
4.
|
Published by highly selective research organization; and |
|
5.
|
Peer-reviewed/juried -- although exceptions will be made
on a case-by-case basis. |
Visitors will be able to go directly to the findings and
recommendations of vetted studies and get the ECS perspective on
why a particular study is a valuable contribution to knowledge
in the policy area.
SEGREGATING SPECIAL-NEEDS STUDENTS
Rhode Island schools are keeping too many special-education students
in separate classrooms, a practice that educators say prevents many
of these students from receiving the same education as their peers
in regular classrooms. About 8,900 of Rhode Island’s 31,000 students
in special education -- 29 percent -- spend the bulk of their class
time in small, "self-contained" classrooms, even though research has
shown that both students with -- and without -- learning
disabilities benefit from learning side by side. In many cases,
reports Jennifer D. Jordan in the Providence Journal, the practice
violates federal laws. Rhode Island already claims the highest
percentage of students in special education in the country -- 21
percent compared with the national average, 13.7 percent, a dilemma
the state has been grappling with for several years. It costs far
more to educate a special-education student in Rhode Island --
$22,893 a year, compared with $9,269 for a regular-education
student. But officials say it is unclear whether integrating
students would cost less than separate classrooms, as the
special-education students would still need extra services. Most
students in special education have mild to moderate learning
disabilities, and state educators concede that most of them would
benefit -- and perform better on state tests -- if they were placed
in integrated classrooms with support from special-education
teachers. (Just 1 percent has disabilities severe enough to be
exempted from standardized state tests. These students take an
alternate assessment.)
MAKING RESEARCH RELEVANT IN THE CLASSROOM
In today’s high stakes accountability environment, schools trying to
implement research-based strategies and curriculum face many
hurdles. "The biggest one," says a Houston area superintendent, "is
the amount of research out there, locating what you need, and having
the time and the staff to actually use research effectively."
Educators aren't the only ones wrestling with research issues. The
U.S. Department of Education and organizations like SEDL are working
to bridge the gap between research and practice, according to a
recent article published in "SEDL Letter." Author Lesley Dahlkemper
writes that not only has the U.S. Department of Education been
working to expand the research base by funding more projects, but is
also working with universities to create a new crop of education
scientists. Although improving the knowledge base is critical,
educators need help adapting research findings to their own schools
and classrooms. Read the full article to learn more about the
challenges of applying high-quality research to improve schools.
NEW CENSUS REPORT ON CHILD WELL-BEING
This interesting and easy-to-read report from the U.S. Census Bureau
highlights many aspects of children’s lives that are related to
their well-being and readiness for school, such as children’s living
arrangements and their family’s characteristics, early child care
experiences, daily interaction with parents, extracurricular
activities, academic experience, and parents’ educational
expectations. These data show that income and family structure
affect various aspects of children’s everyday life. Children living
in families below the poverty level, children whose parents have
lower levels of educational attainment, and children in families
with single parents tend to have less daily interaction with their
parents, such as talking, being read to, or sharing daily meals,
than their counterparts in other situations. Children whose families
live below poverty and with lower levels of family income are less
likely to participate in extracurricular activities and to be
academically on-track than children living in families above poverty
and with higher levels of family income.
GOVERNOR PROPOSES A CUSTOMIZED EDUCATION PLAN
FOR EVERY STUDENT
Once, it was enough for teachers to ask, "What do you want to be
when you grow up?" Now, if a proposed law passes, teachers would
have to sit down with every seventh- through 12th-grader in Arizona
and draw up a customized education plan. Arizona schools chief Tom
Horne is proposing that each student in those grades have a personal
learning plan by 2011. It would be reviewed and updated at least
once a year by parents and teachers. The purpose is to ensure that
an educator sits down with every student, smart or struggling, and
talks to him or her regularly about a course of study and what
happens after high school. Now, many kids rarely meet with guidance
counselors, who are overwhelmed. Arizona averages one counselor for
every 783 students, one of the highest ratios in the country,
reports Pat Kossan in the Arizona Republic. Personal learning plans
are part of a national high school reform movement, and 19 states
are phasing the plans into their schools. If a child wants to be a
veterinarian, he or she must be told it is tough to get into college
with fifth-grade reading skills and a transcript full of D's. He
would be guided to do better. The upside to the plan: It could push
students to be more active in deciding what they are learning and
understand why they are learning it. And it would get parents
involved. The downside: It would create more work for teachers.
INSIDE THE MYSTICAL WORLD OF GRANTWRITING
As anyone who has toiled in the time-intensive process of
grantwriting can attest, a "no" from a foundation is incredibly
disheartening -- especially when that no comes in the form of a
stock rejection letter. And while nonprofit professionals are
accustomed to rejection -- not every potential donor can say yes it
is safe to assume that they'd like to hear as few of them as
possible. One way to achieve this is to better understand the
grantseeking process -- from identifying possible foundations to the
packaging of the proposal and everything in between. Cheryl A.
Clarke and Susan P. Fox detail and deconstruct this complicated
process in their book, "Grant Proposal Makeover: Transform Your
Request from No to Yes." The authors begin by making an important
point, and they do this in the form of an analogy -- that of a grant
proposal to a resume. They explain that both are an integral step in
a larger progression of steps. While foundations have funded
nonprofits based solely on the strength of their grant requests,
they are more likely to fund those with whom they have met or
spoken, whose mission and programs they know and understand. A job
seeker will find that sending out a generic cover letter and resume
is not the most effective way to become employed, no matter how many
envelopes he or she puts in the mail. Instead, the savvy applicant
will tailor each letter to each company, explaining why he or she is
the perfect fit for the job. Sending out blanket proposals to every
foundation in the surrounding community will garner about as many
approvals as the generic cover letter did for the job seeker. Of
course, the resume is the first step in a long process. Once it is
submitted, writes Kate Golden in OnPhilanthropy.com, the best
candidates are brought in for interviews. It is not normally the
resume itself that gets the applicant hired. This is not to
understate the importance of the proposal, as the authors make
clear. A grant proposal is a tangible product; one that others will
read to make decisions about the effectiveness of the nonprofit’s
programs. It is critical that the proposal is articulate,
well-written, and error-free, especially when only one out of every
ten grant requests receives foundation funding. |