|
COMPLAINING ALL THE WAY TO EDUCATION SUCCESSES
IN THE NATION'S SCHOOLS
Expect to read a lot of retrospectives on No Child Left Behind. The
controversial package of national education reforms marked its
five-year anniversary this week. Administrators, teachers and others
will no doubt lament that Washington hasn't put its money where its
mouth is, write the editors of The Journal News, and complain that
the one-size-fits-all reforms leave much to be desired. The
criticisms and observations will no doubt be dead on. But what has
been encouraging to many observers are statistics showing
significant gains by those on the downside of the achievement gap.
The consternation has been worth it to these beneficiaries --
underperformers defying others' time-honored low expectations.
Certainly more federal funding should be forthcoming and lots of
work remains, but for all the complaints -- kids who were ignored,
forgotten or otherwise underserved are being dealt with, or at least
more of them are. A critical review of NCLB is overdue. But this
editorial says there is more than anecdotal evidence to suggest that
Congress should get behind NCLB, preferably one that is improved,
better funded and up to the very hard challenges that remain.
NCLB: REFLECTIONS ON NEW DIRECTIONS AFTER FIVE
YEARS OF MIXED OUTCOMES
At Public Education Network (PEN), we believe that an active, vocal
constituency demanding educational improvement is the key to
ensuring that every child, in every community, benefits from a
quality public education. The fifth anniversary of the passage of
the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) reminds us of how important it
is for the country to continue to focus on education reform. In
public hearings convened by PEN nationwide, Americans reported
significant concern over NCLB's implementation. The public supports
accountability, but believes the current NCLB accountability system
is too narrow. It rejects the idea that a single test can create an
accurate portrayal of how well a school is performing and believes
that such a determination is often at odds with evaluations based on
state assessments and inconsistent with how members of the public
personally evaluate their schools. Labeling schools "in need of
improvement," typically interpreted as "failing," creates conditions
whereby schools are abandoned. This destructive impact goes well
beyond the school; it tears at the fabric of community. The public’s
belief in the community as a true partner in school success has
intensified. The public is certain that schools cannot go it alone,
that communities must be key partners, and that responsibility and
accountability for student success must be shared. As part of a
larger strategy to inform the upcoming reauthorization of NCLB, PEN
will convene another set of hearings this year on this extremely
important and often controversial matter that affects the 50 million
children who attend public school in the United States.
WHY WE HONOR DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
Between 1955 and 1968, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. helped change
America. He brought to the world's attention to the unfair and
immoral treatment of blacks in the United States and around the
globe. He had the help of millions of Americans, but his strong
leadership and unprecedented power of speech gave people the faith
and courage to keep working peacefully even when others did not.
This led to new laws that ended legal discrimination, legal
segregation, and other practices of keeping people of different
backgrounds apart. America will always remember the work of Martin
Luther King, Jr. Each year, on the third Monday in January, we
celebrate his birthday and pause to honor his life and dreams of
equal opportunity and liberty for all. This is the first national
holiday to honor an individual black American. The legacy of Dr.
King lives in each of us and we are responsible to promote, teach
and live the American Dream. Many classroom teachers also pause in
the weeks leading up to Martin Luther King Day to take advantage of
an opportunity to teach about the King legacy of tolerance,
equality, and respect. The life of American hero Martin Luther King
Jr. offers many teaching opportunities. In this article, Education
World presents cross-curricular and cross-grade lessons teachers can
use to share King's life and legacy with students.
HOW BUSH EDUCATION LAW HAS CHANGED OUR SCHOOLS
A cornerstone of President Bush's domestic agenda and one of his few
truly bipartisan successes, No Child Left Behind took what was once
a fairly low-key funding vehicle (it was known as the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act before Bush borrowed the catchy name from
the Children's Defense Fund) and turned it into a vast -- and
contentious-- book of federal mandates. But one thing is certain,
reports Greg Toppo in USA TODAY: No Child Left Behind has had a
major influence on the daily experience of school for millions of
kids. Here are five big ways it's changing schools:
|
1.
|
It’s driving teachers crazy; |
|
2.
|
It's narrowing what many schools teach; |
|
3.
|
Invisible students get attention; |
|
4.
|
It's making the school day longer; and |
|
5.
|
It's changing how reading is taught. |
A MARSHALL PLAN FOR TEACHING
Research indicates that expert teachers are the most important
-- and the most inequitably distributed -- school resource.
However, in the United States, schools serving more than one
million of our highest-need students are staffed by a parade of
underprepared and inexperienced teachers who know little about
effective instruction, and even less about teaching
English-language learners and students with disabilities. Many
of these teachers enter the classroom with little training and
leave soon after, creating greater instability in their wake.
Meanwhile, affluent students receive teachers who are typically
better prepared than their predecessors, further widening the
achievement gap. If we are serious about leaving no child
behind, we need to go beyond mandates to ensure that all
students have well-qualified teachers. In Education Week,
education professor Linda Darling-Hammond outlines several
solutions. First, the federal government should establish
service scholarships to cover training costs in high-quality
programs. Second, recruitment incentives are needed to attract
and retain expert, experienced teachers in high-need schools.
Third, as is true in medicine, the Marshall Plan for Teaching
should support improved preparation. Fourth, providing mentoring
for all beginning teachers would reduce attrition and increase
competence. Finally, preparation and mentoring can be
strengthened if they are guided by a high-quality
teacher-performance assessment that measures actual teaching
skill. In the long run, these proposals would save far more than
they cost. The savings would include the more than $2 billion
now wasted annually because of high teacher turnover, plus the
even higher costs of grade retention, summer school, remedial
programs, lost wages, and prison sentences for dropouts (another
$50 billion, increasingly tied to illiteracy and school
failure).
AMERICANS WANT TO SPEND MORE ON EDUCATION,
HEALTH
Overall, the American public favors more government spending,
particularly for education and health, areas that have consistently
lead the public’s spending priorities in recent years, according to
a new survey from the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the
University of Chicago. The findings come from NORC’s General Social
Survey, which asks people for their opinion on a wide variety of
subjects, including spending priorities. When questioned about
spending on education for the 2006 survey, 74.1 percent said the
government is spending too little, while 5.4 percent felt the
government is spending too much, creating an overall score of +68.7.
Support for health spending came in second at +66.4. Other top
priorities in spending are assistance to the poor (+62.0), the
environment (+61.9), social security (+59.2), dealing with drug
addition (+54.8) and halting crime (+54.6). Near the bottom of the
priority ranking, was spending on the military. The latest survey
shows that 26.8 percent of Americans feel the government is spending
too little on national defense, while 33.8 percent feel it is
spending the right amount and 39.4 percent feel too much is spent,
earning military spending a score of -12.6 on the scale.
HARD CHOICES: WAR IN IRAQ OR 35,000 NEW
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS?
The cost of war in Iraq has exceeded $350 billion and the cost to
American taxpayers continues to increase. Federal funding requests
by President Bush to support his new plan to send more than 20,000
additional troops to Iraq remind the American people of the
important tradeoffs in continuing to wage war. The National
Priorities Project estimates that $350 billion would have built more
than 35,000 new elementary schools nationwide or hired 6 million
teachers. Click the link below to view comparisons of war costs to
funding universal pre-school, expanding health insurance to
children, funding public education, providing college scholarships,
and building safe and affordable public housing.
SHOCKS FROM THE SYSTEM
Although the New York State Department of Education bans corporal
punishment, each year it uses taxpayer money to send dozens of
children with emotional or learning disabilities to schools that use
physically and mentally abusive forms of behavior modification.
These include electric shocks, seclusion and sleep and food
deprivation. Because these punishments are euphemized as "aversive
therapy," they have until recently stayed under the department’s
radar. But this summer, the New York State Board of Regents decided
to regulate the use of such measures. Thankfully, the proposed new
rules, which the Regents are scheduled to enact this week, ban
aversive treatment after 2009. Unfortunately, however, for this
school year and the two that follow, young New Yorkers who receive a
"child specific exemption" will still be subject to some of these
therapies, and those who get this treatment now could continue to
receive it after 2009. This is a mistake, writes author Maia
Szalavitz. Aversive therapy for children should be banned
immediately here in New York and nationwide. Though corporal
punishment can sometimes produce compliance among unruly children,
history shows that regulators cannot prevent it from being applied
dangerously and inappropriately.
A NEW DAY FOR LEARNING
No one believes that when the bell rings at the end of the school
day, children stop learning. Curiosity bubbles inside the minds of
children from the moment they wake in the morning until they go to
bed at night. Our challenge is to encourage, connect, and foster
learning throughout a child’s day. How do we help children make
sense of all the information and experiences in their lives?
Policymakers face a challenge: How do we ensure that all children
have opportunities to reach their full potential in a competitive
world where thinking skills are the most important asset of a
society? According to an urgent report from the Time, Learning, and
Afterschool Task Force funded by the Charles Stewart Mott
Foundation, we can start by organizing learning time more
effectively. The paradigm in this report is unique. It requires us
to think beyond our individual responsibilities and consider the
organizational, policy, and traditional barriers we impose on
creating a seamless learning day for children. We are not getting
very far, very fast because we persist in placing all the
responsibility for teaching on the schools and on a short school
day. The aspirations of every community -- affluent to low income,
homogeneous to widely diverse -- are limited by these habits.
Without a broader view of learning, all American school-age children
will be denied access to experiences that will help them be
successful lifelong learners. Based on extensive research and
emerging policies and practices, the Task Force envisions a system
rich with multiple ways to learn and develop, anchored to high
standards, and aligned to educational resources throughout a
community.
DISTRICTS ARE GETTING TOUGH WITH PARENTS WHO
HOP BOUNDARIES TO ENROLL STUDENTS
School districts, education agencies, and even municipal governments
are increasing their attention on the practice of falsifying
residency status to attend a specific school, according to the cover
story of the January issue of American School Board Journal. "With
fewer than a quarter of states offering open enrollment programs,
the only choice for most families, at least as far as they can see,
is to cheat the system," writes ASBJ senior editor Naomi Dillon in
"Crossing the Line." Different reasons drive different families. For
many, it is purely about providing their children with a better
education, which may translate into better services, more rigorous
academics, or specialized programs. "All districts aren't the same
and parents see that," says Hank Langhals, director of student
services for Gahanna-Jefferson Schools in Ohio. "They can't afford
to move, but they want to do what’s best for their child." The
Journal examines how school districts across the country are
addressing the border issue and dealing with the growth in illegal
registration, which often involves the use of a friend’s or
relative’s address, but can also include fake leases and false
identification. Dillon writes that the main reason for enforcing
student residency requirements is the cost to local taxpayers of
educating out-of-district students. But some district officials are
just as anxious about what outsiders do to their test scores.
NCLB CALLED "BEYOND REPAIR"
A former Bush administration education official has fueled the No
Child Left Behind debate by withdrawing his support of the
controversial education reform law. Michael Petrilli was a U.S.
Department of Education associate assistant deputy secretary who
helped promote the education reform law. But as Bush officials were
hailing the law on its fifth anniversary Monday, blogs buzzed about
an article Petrilli released Friday, reports Nicole Stricker in the
Salt Lake Tribune. "I've gradually and reluctantly come to the
conclusion that NCLB as enacted is fundamentally flawed and probably
beyond repair," Petrilli, the current vice president at the Fordham
Foundation, wrote. "NCLB has 'changed the conversation' in education
. . . But let's face it: It doesn't help the dedicated principal who
is pulling her hair out because of the law's nonsensical
provisions." Petrilli's criticism was a sea change. He characterized
himself as a "true believer" in the law, which can withhold federal
funding from schools if too many students flub standardized math or
reading tests. Although Petrilli spent five years promoting it, he
said he had doubts about aspects of the law from the beginning.
Among them: requiring districts to hire only "highly qualified
teachers" who had degrees in their subject areas, and allowing
states to define "proficiency" as they saw fit. "Other flaws,"
Petrilli wrote, "took me longer to appreciate." He still agrees with
the spirit and goals of the law, but realized the federal government
can't force states and school districts to do things they don't want
to do and "it's impossible to force them to do those things well."
MORE CHILDREN LEARN MORE THAN ONE LANGUAGE
In today's globalized world, according to USA TODAY, many American
parents insist that the education of their young children include
foreign languages. Not only is learning a foreign language easier
for children than it is for adults, but children who are exposed to
other languages also do better in school, score higher on
standardized tests, are better problem solvers and are more open to
diversity, says François Thibaut, who runs The Language Workshop for
Children.
THE FEDS ARE
HERE TO HELP YOU -- WITH FREE STUFF!
Middle-school reform expert John Norton, a frequent NewsBlast
contributor, writes that he is pretty impressed with the redesign of
the U.S. Department of Education's FREE website, which serves as a
repository of school-related resources from agencies across the
spectrum of federal government. FREE stands for "Federal Resources
for Educational Excellence" and has been around since 1998, but has
always needed a better organizational structure and search engine.
The new design, launched in December, has improved navigation and
images throughout the site. Click on the link for the new subject
map (upper left corner) and you'll find a list of more than 100
topics and the number of resources for each. Example: U.S.
History/Famous People/Inventors (36). There's an RSS feed so savvy
web-surfers can receive updated information without revisiting the
site. Subjects covered include social studies, US and world history,
science, math, health and physical education, arts and music and
language arts. Well worth investigating!
WHO HAVE YOU OFFENDED TODAY?
What are you doing to make your organization remarkable? What is its
remarkable story? Who are its remarkable people? How well are you
communicating its remarkability? Roger Craver and Tom Belford advise
us you to find out exactly what makes your most passionate
supporters most excited about and committed to you, then do more of
it, much more ... talk about it, a lot ... and get rid of the chaff.
HURRIED LIFESTYLE AND HEAVY ACADEMIC,
EXTRACURRICULAR LOAD TAKING TOLL
A new report from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says free
and unstructured play is healthy and essential for helping children
reach important social, emotional, and cognitive developmental
milestones as well as helping them manage stress and become
resilient. The report, "The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy
Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds," is
written in defense of play and in response to forces threatening
free play and unscheduled time. These forces include changes in
family structure, the increasingly competitive college admissions
process, and federal education policies that have led to reduced
recess and physical education in many schools. Whereas play protects
children's emotional development, a loss of free time in combination
with a hurried lifestyle can be a source of stress, anxiety and may
even contribute to depression for many children. The report
reaffirms that the most valuable and useful character traits that
will prepare children for success come not from extracurricular or
academic commitments, but from a firm grounding in parental love,
role modeling and guidance. Still, many parents are afraid to slow
their pace for fear their children will fall behind. The report
suggests that reduced time for physical activity may be contributing
to the academic differences between boys and girls, as schools with
sedentary learning styles become more difficult settings for some
boys to navigate successfully. To help parents and teens develop
resiliency and understand the role of stress in life, the AAP has
created a resiliency website that features additional information on
stress reduction and coping skills, as well as a stress management
plan teens can personalize to fit their personalities and
lifestyles.
ZOOMERS: THE NEW WORLD OF ACADEMICALLY DRIVEN
YOUTH
What happened to high school? It doesn't take a genius -- or a
precocious high school student -- to understand that ramped-up
achievement is tightly connected to ramped-up competition for slots
at prestigious colleges. At top high schools, tension about college
admissions permeates the atmosphere, and students push themselves to
the limit. But with so much college coursework before college,
educators say, the academic progression is out of whack. Of course,
there have always been smart kids, writes Laura Pappano in the New
York Times. But whether out of fear, cultural conditioning or some
inherent spark, more adolescents than ever before are emerging from
the pack and distinguishing themselves academically. Super-achievers
aren't just bright; they crave that distinction.
HISPANIC ACHIEVEMENT LAGGING BEHIND IN U.S.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) has released a statistical
brief that portrays the U.S. educational system as an obstacle
course from preschool through college for the growing population of
Latino students. "Hispanic Education in the United States"
identifies the key barriers facing Hispanic students, who continue
to have the lowest levels of educational achievement of any ethnic
group. The report notes, for example, that less than half of
Hispanic males complete high school. Report highlights include:
|
1.
|
Latinos are a significant proportion of the United States
student population. Latino students enrolled in prekindergarten through
12th grade in U.S. public schools and institutions of higher education
represented 17percent of total student enrollment in 2005. |
|
2.
|
The number of ELL students enrolled in U.S. schools has
increased substantially in the past decade. Nearly 80 percent of ELL
students are Hispanic native Spanish-speakers. |
|
3.
|
Hispanics are significantly less likely to complete high
school than their White peers. |
|
4.
|
Schools serving Hispanic and other minority students
offer fewer rigorous academic courses. |
|
5.
|
Hispanics age 25 and older are less likely than Blacks
and Whites to receive a bachelor’s degree. |
FORCING A RISKY BUSINESS MODEL ON PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
Political and business leaders are openly promulgating forced
competition among schools, coveting any new idea that comes
along to demonstrate anecdotal improvement and using flawed
statistics to foist unproven changes on schools, writes Robert
Brower, a veteran Indiana school district leader in School
Administrator magazine. Not only is the business model of reform
misguided, he writes, there is not a shred of statistically
significant research that supports the notion that competition
will solve whatever ails K-12 education. If we succumb to this
experiment of political thought, the consequences may be
devastating to our economic and social future. Unfortunately,
many educators do not recognize the hidden agenda -- the
dismantling of public education. During recent national
elections it was common to hear politicians calling for schools
to be operated more like retail franchises, competing for
customers in a crowded marketplace. Rather than shaming schools
into improving, we should be supporting low-achieving schools
partnering with successful schools. The "produce or die"
operating model of the corporate arena and academia may work
with manufacturing cogs and college professors, but this
business approach to education has no proven track record of
success for students and schools. Continuing to advocate a
politically motivated, market-driven system of education will
only delay the real work that needs to be done to help our
public schools grow. We should not be at odds with one another
but rather respectful of our separate areas of expertise.
NUMBER OF NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFIED TEACHERS
TOPS 55,000
Nearly 7,800 of the nation’s top teachers achieved National Board
Certification in 2006, a 7 percent increase over the number of
teachers who earned certification in 2005. The cumulative total of
National Board Certified Teachers stands at 55,306. The states with
the highest number of teachers who recently attained National Board
Certification were North Carolina (1,525), Florida (1,513), South
Carolina (636), Illinois (431) and Washington (407). Among evidence
that the National Board Certified Teacher movement is growing:
|
1.
|
The number of National Board Certified Teachers has more
than tripled in the past five years; |
|
2.
|
Nineteen states have at least 30 percent growth in the
number of new 2006 National Board Certified Teachers; |
|
3.
|
There is a westward increase in new National Board
Certified Teachers. North Dakota, Utah, Texas, Colorado, South Dakota,
Arizona, and Wyoming show the highest percentage growth of National
Board Certified Teachers; |
|
4.
|
While the number of Caucasian teachers achieving National
Board Certification remained steady between 2005 and 2006, other
racial/ethnic groups increased. |
During the same
period, African American National Board Certified Teachers
increased 24 percent, Hispanic teachers increased 13 percent and
Native American teachers increased 50 percent. National Board
Certification is the highest credential in the teaching
profession. A teacher-driven, voluntary process established by
NBPTS, certification is achieved through a rigorous,
performance-based assessment that typically takes one to three
years to complete and measures what accomplished teachers should
know and be able to do. As part of the process, teachers build a
portfolio that includes student work samples, assignments,
videotapes and a thorough analysis of their classroom teaching.
Additionally, teachers are assessed on their knowledge of the
subjects they teach. |