|
TEACHER CONTRACTS: RESTORING THE BALANCE
The general public is rarely aware of the role that collective
bargaining plays in education. Most taxpayers are typically unaware
of what is negotiated by union representatives and school committees
and probably assume that the education dollar is being spent to
improve learning.
Growing concern about school funding nationally may soon change
that. The Education Partnership -- a Providence-based local
education fund -- has issued a new report in the hope of raising
public awareness, to facilitate a constructive dialogue across the
State of Rhode Island, and to change the focus and scope of
collective bargaining in public education. The Education
Partnership’s analysis examines contract language relating to
management rights, grievance procedures, sick leave, union leaves,
professional development, and working conditions. It offers
negotiable alternatives within each area and recommendations for
legislative change.
The
report analyzes the four major elements of teacher contracts:
teacher evaluation, salary, seniority, and health insurance -- and
makes specific recommendations for changes in legislation affecting
each area. The purpose of this report is not to portray unions as
villains. The job of union negotiators is to defend and advance the
economic interests of their members. School committees are charged
with representing the interests of the district and the taxpayers.
Unfortunately, these conflicting agendas, more often than not, have
resulted in labor agreements about excessive adult entitlements and
allocation of dollars, and have little to do with improving
education. Their analyses led to three broad conclusions:
|
1.
|
Teacher union contracts restrict flexibility and school
autonomy; |
|
2.
|
Many of the clauses in the contracts drive up the cost of
education without improving quality; and |
|
3.
|
Teacher unions have used the bargaining process to
entrench the role of the union in the contracts, weakening management
rights. |
RED LAKE TEEN: NOT ALONE IN HIS
DESPAIR
The recent murders at Red Lake Indian Reservation highlight the
problems that American Indian teenagers have been quietly
suffering in greater numbers than most adolescents: suicide,
violence, depression and pregnancy. By themselves, the numbers
for the Red Lake Indian Reservation are staggering. A state
survey conducted last year of 56 ninth-graders showed that 81
percent of the girls and 43 percent of the boys had considered
suicide. Almost half the girls said they'd actually tried to
kill themselves, reports Deborah Hastings. Twenty percent of
boys said the same -- numbers about triple the rate statewide.
The Minnesota survey of Red Lake students said they assaulted
other classmates and used more alcohol and drugs than other
students across the state. Nationwide figures show that American
Indian teenagers commit suicide at three times the national
rate; are involved in alcohol-related arrests at twice the
national average, and die in alcohol-related incidents at 17
times the national average. They are third-highest in teen
pregnancies, behind Hispanics and blacks. ''Only the most gifted
students can overcome this stuff," said Bill Lawrence, publisher
of the Native American Press-Ojibwe News.
DIFFERENT LENSES, DIFFERENT VISIONS
The so-called "culture war" has been described as a conflict between
two broadly defined and loosely affiliated groups of people -- the
"orthodox" and the "progressives" -- who hold widely differing moral
visions for America. Each sees the other as a threat. The orthodox
fear a progression toward "state-supported, secular humanist, moral
relativism," while progressives fear a slide toward an
"authoritarian, non-tolerant theocracy." This cultural divide
affects education in many ways, leading to debates over taxpayer
support and school vouchers, board elections and politics,
curriculum choices (especially sexuality education), textbook
selections, religious expressions at school and legal protections
for gay and lesbian students. Orthodox and progressive groups
predictably line up on either side of these issues, writes Evonne
Hedgepeth. Caught in the crossfire is the movable middle, the
majority whose opinions fluctuate depending upon which camp they
consider least objectionable. School leaders face a moral dilemma of
their own: how to advocate for necessary programs, while respecting
the diverse views of stakeholders.
Understanding how individuals view issues through their own moral
lenses and knowing how to articulate advocacy messages accordingly
so that they can be most widely heard can help administrators more
successfully gain and retain support for controversial programs.
HOW MUCH IS A GOOD SCHOOL WORTH?
The practice of moving for a child's education has a long history in
American planning -- in a sense it was exactly why the early,
racially segregated suburbs were invented. But in the Sand Francisco
Bay Area, where the cost of a lowly hovel starts at $400,000,
figuring out where one can afford to live and raise children is
particularly thorny. Urban public schools vary greatly in their
effectiveness, writes Carol Lloyd. (San Jose has everything from the
top-performing schools in the state to the worst-performing
schools.) Almost all are suffering from underfunding, so even for
families committed to public schools, it's a painful equation. Of
course, you could move to a better school district, but generally,
other great minds have thought the same thoughts and have already
pushed those real estate prices up. This predicament leaves many
families with a tangle of questions: Are there any great public
schools secreted away in little-known, not totally unaffordable
neighborhoods? Is it worth paying an extra $100,000 or even $200,000
for a home in a nice neighborhood to get your kid into a good public
school? With our education system forced to use testing as a measure
of success - - marking some schools as failures, others as models --
it's not so hard to imagine that such price margins will only swell,
making the real estate market into a glaring mirror of our social
inequities and our individual hopes to escape them.
AYP SANCTIONS: HOW MANY SCHOOLS ARE
FACING THEM AND WHAT ARE THEY
A first-of-its-kind analysis by the Education Commission of the
States (ECS) shows how many -- and what percentage of -- schools
face sanctions for failing to meet the adequate yearly progress (AYP)
requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This new
50-state compilation "StateNote"
presents the number of schools facing sanctions in each state during
the 2004-05 school year, and the level of sanctions they face. For
example, 40 states have schools that have failed to make AYP for
four consecutive years and are in the "Corrective Actions" category.
All 50 states have schools that have failed to make AYP for two
consecutive years, and districts must offer students in those
schools the opportunity to attend a higher-performing public school.
Sanctions range from being required to provide their students an
opportunity to transfer to a better school to having to undergo
full-scale restructuring. Check out the details at the link above.
"CALL TO ARMS" ON EVOLUTION
Nearly one-third of science teachers who participated in a national
survey say they feel pressured to include creationism-related ideas
in the classroom. And an alarmed science establishment is striking
back in defense of teaching evolution, reports Dan Vergano and Greg
Toppo. "I write to you now because of a growing threat to the
teaching of science," National Academy of Sciences chief Bruce
Alberts says in a letter to colleagues March 4. He calls on academy
members "to confront the increasing challenges to the teaching of
evolution in public schools." The nation's top scientists belong to
the congressionally chartered academy.
The
academy has only rarely strayed into school fights over evolution so
it does not appear to be "meddling" in local affairs, Alberts says.
But now, he says, "one of the foundations of modern science is being
neglected or banished outright from science classrooms in many parts
of the United States."
NEGLECTING EDUCATION IS MARCH MADNESS
Neglecting education is Kentucky's home-grown March Madness. The new
budget and revenue package speeds us down a road we don't need to be
on -- one that leads to education neglect, writes Robert F. Sexton.
Shortchanging education won't create jobs. A budget that will be
short by about $500 million next year isn't fiscally responsible.
Funding basketball training facilities ahead of academic excellence
certifies the madness. For years Kentucky has been falling backward
in education. This budget does nothing to reverse that. Indeed, the
worst will come next fall -- just a few months away -- when the
governor and legislature must figure out how to cover almost $500
million they've borrowed to meet this year's spending commitments
plus increased debt service. But now the challenge is bigger than it
was a few months ago. In education investments on a per pupil basis,
Kentucky ranks 38th in the nation -- not far from 1980s levels.
Kentucky invests $1,200 less per student than the average state.
If we invested at the average level, our education spending would be
$746 million more than it is. Educational gains cannot continue
without bold innovations, continuous school improvement and adequate
investment. The new budget fails on all counts. We can't go backward
in education and forward in creating good jobs at the same time.
Madness is often defined as doing the same thing over and over and
getting the same bad results. This is what we've done. It's
time to stop.
STRENGTHENING PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN
MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOOLS
It’s undeniable. Direct parental involvement in school decreases
dramatically when a child reaches his/her teen years, writes Sue
Blaney. Yet such involvement is essential at the middle and high
school levels and can be one of the strongest predictors of a
teenager’s scholastic achievements. What’s to be done? What really
drives this parental behavior? And how can middle and high school
educators improve communication with, and involvement from, parents?
This paper explores the dynamics of the often-tentative relationship
between parents of teenaged students and their child’s school and
offers some prescriptive advice on what educators can do to improve
connections and build trust and new relationships. Strengthening
parental involvement is not an impossible task, and large increases
in school budgets are not required for improvement to take place.
Improvements can be made by simple adjustments: in reframing
attitudes, in appreciating that each conversation with a parent is
an opportunity to enhance their connections, in thoughtfully
approaching all school-to-parent communication, and identifying the
goals that are shared. Parents, educators and students all share the
goals of academic success during the important middle and high
school years. The more you are intentional and thoughtful in your
communication strategy, the more you focus on enhancing positive
connections between parents and the school, the more you can
positively impact parental involvement, and student success. Visit
the website below to download the entire document. Scroll down
to "Special Report" after clicking on the link above.
2005 INDEX OF CHILD WELL-BEING SHOWS
MIXED PICTURE FOR AMERICA’S CHILDREN Dramatic
declines in rates of violence and risky behaviors such as teen
births, smoking, and alcohol and illegal drug use during the past 10
years have contributed substantially to modest and slow progress in
the overall well-being of America’s children, according to the 2005
Index of Child Well-Being (CWI), released by the Foundation for
Child Development (FCD).
Overall child well-being improved only fractionally since 1975.
Several of the underlying trends are discouraging. The rate of
educational attainment -- as measured by student test scores in
reading and mathematics -- remains stagnant, despite two decades of
national focus on how to improve the education system. More children
live in poverty today than did in 1975. In addition, persistent high
rates of obesity -- which have more than tripled in 30 years -- are
seriously hurting children’s health. FCD President Ruby Takanishi
said that proposed reductions in early education programs could also
have negative effects on children and their families.
"In
fundamental areas such as health, financial security, and education,
our children are either doing poorly or barely treading water,"
Takanishi said. "Policymakers must give serious thought to how they
can better support families. Early intervention and pre-kindergarten
programs that have demonstrated outcomes should be expanded."
TEACHING KIDS TO TEACH
With the need for teachers rising, administrators across the country
are scrambling to come up with ideas to find and train qualified
educators. Florida's Broward County alone will need 13,000 new
teachers over the next decade. As a result, district officials there
have taken a novel approach to build their teacher-force: recruiting
teenage teaching candidates and promising them a job after college.
Rather than recruit from out of the area, Broward County officials
are "growing" their own teachers. Two years ago, the district
started the Urban Teacher Academy Project (UTAP) to prepare students
for careers in urban education. The first group of students
graduated last June, and the program, which began in one high
school, is now expanding to four. Participants are paired with
mentors, are trained in teaching techniques and classroom theory,
and student-teach in elementary schools. After high school, UTAP
students receive scholarships to a local college. When they finish,
there's a guaranteed job. Scholastic Administrator magazine spoke to
Broward County's superintendent, Frank Till, about his district's
bold approach to teacher recruitment. According to Till, "…if
district officials are smart they'll increase their talent base by
recognizing that four years down the line, one of their best sources
for potential teachers is already sitting in a high school
classroom." Read the full interview at the link above.
CLOSING A CHARTER SCHOOL: DEVELOPING A
PROTOCOL OR PLAN
Part and parcel of a charter school authorizer’s oversight
responsibility is the unenviable task of closing a school that fails
to pass muster. As with most challenges that authorizers face,
closing a charter school can be a complex task; executing a closure
decision can entail a web of issues that the prudent authorizer must
unravel carefully. And while no two charter schools’ circumstances
or closure processes will be identical, having a standard yet
adaptable closure protocol guided by principles of effective
leadership will help authorizers address the difficulties of a
school closure consistently, adequately and, most importantly, in a
manner that protects students and the public interest. This Issue
Brief, written by Veronica Geyer, addresses common issues that
authorizers face in executing a school closure and demonstrates how
adherence to Ronald Heifetz’s five strategic principles of adaptive
leadership can help an authorizer respond effectively to the
attendant challenges. In addition, this Brief provides some salient
observations and practical policy approaches that one authorizer,
the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE), has incorporated
into its charter school closure protocol and practices.
PERSPECTIVE: FOLLOW THE MONEY
Money! If you ask the people who serve in the public school system,
there is never enough of it. Why can't we improve student
performance? Not enough money. Why can't we close the achievement
gap between classes and races? Not enough money. Why can't we reduce
the dropout rate? Not enough money. In fact, they may be right,
writes Ronald A. Wolk, but who knows? The United States now
spends roughly $500 billion per year on precollegiate public
education -- more than two and a half billion dollars a school day.
Education is the largest single expenditure item or a close second
to health costs in most state budgets. But, states still don't know
what it means to spend their education dollars effectively.
REMAKING AMERICA'S THREE SCHOOL
SYSTEMS: NOW SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL
The American public has been given a distorted view of the state of
education in our nation’s schools, writes Milton Schwebel. The
schools are not and have never been in crisis. They satisfy the
economic needs of the country and, for that reason among others,
policy makers are not inclined to make greater investments in public
education. Since early in the nation’s history that disinclination
has been evident and, in the last century, no more so than in New
Jersey where one state administration after another over a thirty
year period managed successfully to resist the state’s Supreme Court
decisions demanding greater equity among school districts. Schwebel
explains why charter schools, vouchers and privatization will make
little if any difference, and why state standards-based reforms, and
especially Bush’s No Child Left Behind act, are likely to have
destructive effects. Some excellent school-wide reform programs have
proven useful, he writes, but on their own they cannot surmount the
political and economic obstacles to change.
KEEPING PACE WITH K-12 ONLINE LEARNING
Online learning -- also referred to as e-learning, virtual learning,
and a mode of distance learning -- is unconstrained by time or
place. Online learning provides opportunities for students whose
choices may be limited to their rural location, who are unable to
attend classes due to physical illness or expulsion, who seek credit
recovery or advanced courses, or who have scheduling conflicts in
their home school. Online learning also can be a good alternative
for students who have work or family obligations outside of school.
In addition, students who have social or behavioral issues in school
find that online learning allows them to focus more on content. High
school reformers in particular, bent on boosting dismal graduation
rates and bringing back students who have left the education system,
look at online learning as a means of providing new options to
students. For all these reasons, it is clear that online learning is
more than a passing fad. This policy brief highlights K–12 online
learning policy and practice based on the report, "Keeping Pace with
K–12 Online Learning: A Snapshot of State-Level Policy and
Practice." The publication will help education stakeholders be
proactive in shaping policies in order to ensure success in broad
access, equitable opportunities, and high-quality online learning
options.
REVOLUTIONARY ACCESS TO DATA FOR EDUCATORS &
POLICYMAKERS
SchoolMatters.com, a web-based national education data service that
provides in-depth information and analysis about public schools,
districts and state education systems, was unveiled by the National
Education Data Partnership. SchoolMatters.com is the largest easily
searchable collection of education performance data ever assembled.
In addition to student achievement information, financial data and
demographic breakdowns, the service includes powerful analytical
tools and objective analyses provided by Standard & Poor’s that
provide education leaders with the information they need to make
better-informed decisions about schools and school systems. With
this website, educators in a given school will be able to find
schools that have similar demographics with higher academic
performance. This can be a useful start for schools and districts
looking to develop comprehensive improvement programs and provides a
first step in identifying promising practices of school reform. The
National Education Data Partnership is funded by a $45 million
investment by The Broad Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation.
"FAMILY LIFE" CLASSES URGED FOR SCHOOLS
There are reading, 'riting and 'rithmetic, but proponents of a bill
working its way through the Washington State Legislature say it's
time to focus on a fourth "R" in education -- relationships. The
House earlier this month passed a bill that would encourage public
high schools to offer "family-preservation" classes on building
loving relationships, resolving conflicts, being responsible parents
and managing money. The goal, reports Jessica Blanchard, is to help
students learn the value of strong, enduring relationships and
reinforce the importance of families as the basic unit of society --
lessons many teens may not be learning at home. "It's a neglected
area of our educational system," said Rep. Dave Quall, D-Mount
Vernon, the bill's chief sponsor. Schools tend to focus on academics
and assume parents will pass on basic skills and values to their
children, but that's not always the case, he said. Proponents say a
focus on preparing students for life after high school -- teaching
them how to juggle work and home life more effectively and modeling
good parenting skills -- can strengthen the social fabric and lower
the divorce rate. "Family preservation -- what the heck is that?"
asked Rep. Steve Kirby, D-Tacoma, one of four representatives to
vote against the bill. Kirby worries that high schools that create
the curriculum could wind up alienating some students by promoting
the traditional family structure -- a mother, a father and their
children -- over other types of families, such as those headed by a
single parent or a gay couple. "And how are they going to handle the
whole idea of divorce and avoid being judgmental? This is something
that needs a little more thought," he said. |
|
"Resources for
Indispensable Schools and Educators"
The RISE network is a free resource for teachers who are committed
to improving the education and achievement of students in low-income
K-12 public schools. RISE offers a valuable support network of
resources to enhance work environments and improve student
achievement. Every year in a RISE teacher classroom, low-income
students make significant strides in closing the achievement gap.
RISE offers financial rewards for effective teachers to defray the
cost of materials and supplies. RISE provides pre-screened job
opportunities for effective teachers who want to work in low-income
communities. To learn more, visit the link above.
"Toshiba America Foundation"
Toshiba America Foundation makes grants for projects in math and
science designed by classroom teachers to improve instruction for
students in grades K-12. Maximum Award: $5,000. Eligibility: Grades
K-12. Deadline: Decisions about grants under $5,000 are made on a
rolling basis and applications are accepted throughout the year.
"Best
Buy Children's Foundation"
The Best Buy Children's Foundation supports programs that connect
kids, technology and education. Best Buy's tech program was created
to recognize and reward schools that are integrating interactive
technology into the curriculum. Maximum Award: $2,500 Gift Card.
Eligibility: Public Schools.
Deadline: Ongoing, beginning April 2005.
"Allen Foundation"
The Allen Foundation supports educational nutrition programs, with
priority given to training programs for children and young adults to
improve their health and development. Maximum Award: Past grants
have ranged from $2,000 to $1 million. Eligibility: Schools and
school districts should partner with local nonprofits to form
nutrition education programs. Deadline: Ongoing.
"Intel Model School"
The Intel Model School Program provides equipment for a school or
district to enhance their technology by using advanced technology.
The Intel Model School Program identifies schools that desire
equipment or have a unique project to complete by using Intel
products, and can show the improvement in the quality of the
education experience for both the teacher and the student by using
high-end technology. Award: Seeding of Intel equipment. Eligibility:
K-12 schools or school districts. Deadline: Ongoing.
"Target
Local Giving Program"
This effort promotes a love of reading and encourages children to
read together with their families. Awards recognize programs that
inspire young readers (birth through third grade); and programs that
bring arts to schools or schoolchildren to the arts. Maximum Award:
$1,000-$3,000. Eligibility: Based on quiz. Deadline: May 31, 2005.
"NEA Foundation Grants"
The NEA Foundation provides grants for the purpose of engaging in
high-quality professional development or implementing project-based
learning and break-the-mold innovations that raise student
achievement. Maximum Award: $5,000. Eligibility: public school
teachers, public school education support professionals, and faculty
and staff in public higher education institutions. Deadline: June 1,
2005.
"Fund for Teachers"
Fund for Teachers provides funds for direct grants to teachers to
support summer learning opportunities of their own design. Maximum
Award: $5,000. Eligibility: teachers who work with students
from pre-K through 12th grade, with a minimum of three years
teaching experience, full time, spending at least 50% of the time in
the classroom at the time grants are approved and made. Deadline:
varies by state.
"Goldman Sachs Foundation Prizes
for Excellence in International Education"
The Goldman Sachs Foundation and Asia Society are seeking applicants
for the 2005 Prizes for Excellence in International Education. Five
prizes of $25,000 each annually recognize schools, higher education
institutions, states, and media/technology organizations that are
working to "put the world into world-class education." The Goldman
Sachs Foundation Prizes were created in 2003 to raise awareness of
the growing importance of other world regions to U.S. economic
prosperity and social well-being, and to promote international
knowledge and skills in American schools. Applications are due
May 10 for higher education institutions, states, and
media/technology, and May 17 for elementary, middle and high
schools. Full eligibility and application instructions, along with
information on past winners, are now available at the link above.
"Pinnacle Awards
for Innovation"
Every year the Association of School Business Officials
International presents the Pinnacle Award to four individuals who
have created outstanding practices, proposals, or publications that
enhance school business management. Pinnacle of Achievement
recipients receive a cash prize, a crystal pinnacle award, and
recognition at ASBO's Annual Meeting and Exhibits in Boston, MA,
October 21-24, 2005. The recipient of the highest honor, the
Pinnacle of Excellence, also receives $5,000 worth of furniture for
his or her school district. The Pinnacle Awards program is sponsored
by Virco Mfg. Corporation. Applications are now being accepted
through May 1, 2005.
"National
Dairy Council 3-A-Day of Dairy Nutrition Education Grants"
This grant program is designed to address America’s low calcium
intake and support the philosophy of the nutrition-based marketing
and consumer education program, "3-A-Day of Dairy," and to help
empower kids to be advocates for healthy eating, including three
servings of dairy a day, and an active lifestyle, which contribute
to a healthy weight. Maximum Award: $5,000. Eligibility: Individuals
and organizations. Please note California, Wisconsin, Hawaii and
Puerto Rico are not participating in the
2005 grant program. Deadline: May 13, 2005.
"Show Me
the Money: Tips & Resources for Successful Grant Writing"
Many educators have found that outside funding, in the form of
grants, allows them to provide their students with educational
experiences and materials their own districts can't afford. Learn
how they get those grants -- and how you can get one too. Included:
Practical tips to help first-time grant writers get the grants they
need.
"Department of
Education Forecast of Funding"
This document lists virtually all programs and competitions under
which the Department of Education has invited or expects to invite
applications for new awards for FY 2005 and provides actual or
estimated deadline dates for the transmittal of applications under
these programs. The lists are in the form of charts -- organized
according to the Department's principal program offices -- and
includes previously announced programs and competitions, as well as
those planned for announcement at a later date.
Note: This document is advisory only and is not an official
application notice of the Department of Education. They expect to
provide regular updates to this document.
"Information on
Grants for School Health Programs & Services"
"Grantionary"
The Grantionary is a list of grant-related terms and their
definitions.
"GrantsAlert"
GrantsAlert is a website that helps nonprofits, especially those
involved in education, secure the funds they need to continue their
important work.
"Grant Writing Tips"
SchoolGrants has compiled an excellent set of grant writing tips for
those that need help in developing grant proposals.
"FastWEB"
FastWEB is the largest online scholarship search available, with
600,000 scholarships representing over one billion in scholarship
dollars. It provides students with accurate, regularly updated
information on scholarships, grants, and fellowships suited to their
goals and qualifications, all at no cost to the student. Students
should be advised that FastWEB collects and sells student
information (such as name, address, e-mail address, date of birth,
gender, and country of citizenship) collected through their site.
"Federal Resources for Educational Excellence
(FREE)"
More than 30 Federal agencies formed a working group in 1997 to make
hundreds of federally supported teaching and learning resources
easier to find. The result of that work is the FREE website.
"eSchool News School
Funding Center"
Information on up-to-the-minute grant programs, funding sources, and
technology funding.
"Philanthropy News Digest"
Philanthropy News Digest, a weekly news service of the Foundation
Center, is a compendium, in digest form, of philanthropy-related
articles and features culled from print and electronic media outlets
nationwide.
"School Grants"
A collection of resources and tips to help K-12 educators apply for
and obtain special grants for a variety of projects. |